[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
| msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
| 1 | ericz@cloud9.net | 19 | Re: Hella's |
| 2 | PurnellJE@aol.com | 36 | Re: D90 Rain Windows |
| 3 | ericz@cloud9.net | 97 | Re: Potential Rover Owner Looking for help |
| 4 | David Rosenbaum [rosenba | 42 | Re: D90 Rain Windows |
| 5 | "Tom Rowe" [trowe@AE.AGE | 46 | Re: Portable winches |
| 6 | John Antram [rewt@sover. | 22 | Air Damns on the discovery |
| 7 | Shaun Carrigan [shaunc@i | 19 | Re: Range Rover Speedometers |
| 8 | rovah@agate.net (John Ca | 20 | [not specified] |
| 9 | Tebbin Salvesen [tsalves | 9 | Re: Hella's |
| 10 | Tebbin Salvesen [tsalves | 15 | Re: Range Rover Speedometers |
| 11 | "Lee Zeltzer" [lzeltzer@ | 75 | Arizona dedication of Great Western Trail |
| 12 | "Lee Zeltzer" [lzeltzer@ | 20 | Re: Hella's |
| 13 | GElam30092@aol.com | 27 | Re: portable winches |
| 14 | 73363.427@compuserve.com | 28 | Bumper Stickers |
| 15 | PurnellJE@aol.com | 22 | Re: Hella's |
| Majordomo | About the digest |
From: ericz@cloud9.net Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 07:02:34 -0800 Subject: Re: Hella's On Fri, 1 Mar 1996, KKelly6788@aol.com wrote: >want to first try improving what you have. I have Hella H-4 European >headlights that replaced the main headlights. Definitely agree. I started with lucas incadescent, upgraded to Hella halogens and finally I have H4 lamps. The H4 setup is not Hella, however, with a great savings in money. They are knockoffs named 'Autopal' but have the same lens and use Hella bulbs. They cost about $25 each, complete. If anyone is interested, e-mail me and I'll see if I can find where I got them. Regards, Eric ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: PurnellJE@aol.com Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 11:08:33 -0500 Subject: Re: D90 Rain Windows In a message dated 96-03-01 21:02:01 EST, you write: > but at speed, rain blows in from >behind so I am not sure how much plastic side windows would help.They [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >You mention removing the rear plastic windows from your soft top - was >your top modified? My '94 windows are sewn in, but the '95s zip out. Thanks David. I didn't think of that, the "from behind" attack. I guess the plastics won't do much for that. I'll post any attempts or success/failure I have with my ideas. Since I bought my '94 in May of '95, very late, I got the 95 Besstop fitted, not the Tickford. While I like the besstop side rails as opposed to the tickford snaps for securing the top, I really like the way your windows just roll up and get tied. Yea, I can unzip and remove mine, but then what the heck do you do with em? Again, same problem with the doortops, can't leave them in the truck, theft. Maybe I could sew some snap-straps up top so I could tie them up like yours. At least a vandal wouldn't be able to just grab them and run, and they would "look" like they were permanently attached. Regarding teh tonneau cover, I never did figure out where to put the metal bar that came with mine, you use it? . I ran my tonneau without it and never had a problem. I also didn't use the center snap-strap that goes up to the snap on the roll bar. I assume this is to pull up slightly on the cover to form an apex for rain to slide off. I guess I'll be using it here!! :>) John, 94 d90, 95 top, 94 tonneau cover(with snaps, not belt rail--so I got both snaps AND beltrail system) ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ericz@cloud9.net
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 08:19:04 -0800
Subject: Re: Potential Rover Owner Looking for help
On Sat, 2 Mar 1996, ccoryell@osiris.ac.hmc.edu wrote:
>I am a college student contemplating the purchase of my first vehicle. I
>am looking for a SUV type thing for general transportation and mountain
[ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)]
>likely to satisfy my needs.
> I would really appreciate any and all information and advice that
>people care to give me.
> how do these things hold up/ how much regular maintainance is required?
> and how much does said maintaince cost?
They hold up very well if the maintenance is done properly. The 3.5 litre V8
engine needs regular oil changes or it will self destruct. Being a So. Cal
vehicle you probably don't have too much rust, although you should check the
rear tailgate for such attack. Maintenance costs what you want it to cost. If
you can't or wont do much of the work yourself, you will get raped on the cost.
I'm convinced that around here, there is an extra $20 an hour tacked onto the
shop rate as soon as you mention Range Rover. They're realtively basic vehicles
but you get handed a bunch of BS about them being exceedingly 'foreign' and
complex in order to justify the higher bills. Parts, of course, cost more than
with a US built vehicle.
> how can I be assured that the guy is selling me a good car?
You can't. Get someone who knows cars very well (mechanic you trust, other RRO)
to inspect the vehicle from top to bottom.
> which engine/other components of interest does vehicle probably have?
> which type of 4 wheel drive does it have?
The Rover has a 3.5 litre V8 engine. It is a very good powerplant with lots of
low-end torque. If you're comparing it to some US SUV, its not the most powerful
in the world but it gets you where you want to go. All Range Rovers have full
time four wheel drive....far superior to the 'all wheel drive' found in some
newer vehicles. The vehicle in question is also what's called "gray market",
not officially imported by Land Rover. This means that various modifications
may have had to be done to meet emmissions spec. Get a good mechanic to check
the quality of installation
should I throw caution to the wind and just buy it because it is
cooler than any ford explorer could ever hope to be?
You may buy it because of that but don't throw caution into the wind! There are
Range Rovers for sale out there, don't settle for an unknown quantity as far as
the mechanicals are concerned.
> do people take range rovers on mountain roads, are they really
>capable, or is it just advertising? (the guy seemed shocked I might take it
>off road)
NO, IT IS NOT JUST ADVERTISING. The Range Rover has the most capable off-road
suspention of any vehicle sold in this country. It is not even remotely
comparable to any other SUV. Axle articulation is phenomenal, allowing all four
wheels to stay in contact with the ground when the going gets tough. The Range
Rover was the first vehicle to cross the Darien Gap, a previously impassable
section of jungle in South America. The RR was in the Camel Trophy one year and
the current Discoveries in the Trophy have almost exactly the same running gear.
I have been on many off-road excursions with RRs and they never fail to perform
better than anything else out on the trail (except maybe a D90) Yeah, he seemed
shocked that you would take it off-road, that's because its percieved as a
luxury vehicle...under the plush exterior it is an incredible machine.
> how do they do at high altitudes (>7000 ft)
The V8 engine (which I believe is carbureted) works fine at altitude. I had my
V8 at 9400ft in Colorado for 2 months with seemingly no ill effects and I didn't
do any tuning for the altitude.
> Is this a decent car to learn how to reduce to its component parts and
>put back together?
No, probably not. It is as complex as any vehicle of that vintage. With proper
guidance you can learn how to work on it, but it might be difficult. If you
want raw simplicity go for a "Series" Land Rover. They are rugged, capable and
dirt simple...as well as being uncomfortable. As a tool for learning about
cars, they are second to none.
> would some other rover be a better car and could I afford it and find
>one for sale (I am looking for less than $9k) like maybe the defender 109
>or a series rover?
Well, there's no such thing as a Defender 109...the Defender 110 is way out of
your price range. You can find a good Series Land Rover (88 or 109) for your
price range...buyer beware, however, Series Vehicles are older and many have
been abused.
Well, good luck to you...owning a Rover goes beyond the vehicle, you buy into a
great group of people....
Regards,
Eric
------------------------------
[ <- Message 4 -> end
| Table of Contents
| <- Digest 960303 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 09:02:59 -0800 (PST) From: David Rosenbaum <rosenbau@u.washington.edu> Subject: Re: D90 Rain Windows On Sat, 2 Mar 1996 PurnellJE@aol.com wrote: > Since I bought my '94 in May of '95, very late, I got the 95 Besstop fitted, > not the Tickford. While I like the besstop side rails as opposed to the [ truncated by lro-digester (was 11 lines)] > snap on the roll bar. I assume this is to pull up slightly on the cover to > form an apex for rain to slide off. I guess I'll be using it here!! :>) Dear John: I always thought that the zip out soft top windows were better than the roll ups - I guess the grass is always greener..... I did find after a long trip that driving with the Tickford windows unzipped and rolled up, that mine acquired "distinctive" bands of haziness (little scratches!) due to plastic rubbing against plastic, probably with a bit of road grit blown in at speed (not so great for visibility; but maybe I can think of it as a "rear window vanity feature for changing clothes in back or some such thing.) I, too, don't know what the long metal piece that comes with the tonneau cover is for, so it sits in my garage. I use the cover a lot in the rain. And snapping the strap to the roll bar does help in getting the water to roll off (instead of forward and into) the D90. I have some waterproof seat covers that I got from Rovers North a couple of years ago (one of their Christmas specials) That were designed for a RR (or Discovery): so they kind of flop around at speed, but keep the seat cushions dry (and my pants wet!). I also keep a squeegie and towel in the dashboard bin to wipe the water off the inside of the windshield. In a 'good' rain, driving at speed, considerable rain blows onto the inside of the windshield, also, droplets congregate and coalesce on the inside of the surrey top, which then fall onto the driver. But such a rain does a *great* job of washing off dust. I also have one of those yellow "Gloucester Fisherman" hats (stored *somewhere* in the Land Rover) but I've never quite had the nerve or need to "tie it on." Best, David ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <trowe@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 11:32:10 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: Portable winches > In a message dated 96-03-01 15:42:36 EST, a-robw@MICROSOFT.com (Robert Watson (CNA)) writes: I know (from personal experience) it's very easy to have a hi-power (e.g. 9K# capacity) winch to do more harm then good if used incorrectly or inappropriately (but we won't talk about that right now....) > Even a low rated winch can do a lot of harm (read, kill you) if you use it wrong. Anything up to 12,000# should be no problem if used properly and mounted correctly. In the "mounted correctly" mind set, keep in mind what class III recievers are rated. If I'm not mistaken it's about 10,000#. If you snatch block an 8000# winch, you have the potential of exceeding the hitch rating. Of course the hitch has some safety factor and you're not too likely to be using a snatch block when winching backwards, but there's many a time I've stalled my winch in a two line pull. That's a 16000# load. I have mine mounted properly in my front bumper with grade 8 bolts and nuts, but if I'd gone the receiver route, it would have been mounted in a receiver in the front also, and exceeded it's rating. The moral is, no matter how you mount it, don't forget it's (and your) limits. A winch can be LETHAL. As for what size winch to get, if you're mainly using it for self extraction, or pulling out another off-roader, a 6000# winch is plenty. Remember, many people use capstan winches that use manila rope and are rated at 3000# or less. With a 6000# and a snatch block, you can make a 12000# pull on the first wrap. If it takes more than that to get you out, you've got other problems. Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research Madison,WI, USA 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 12:41:50 -0500 (EST) From: John Antram <rewt@sover.net> Subject: Air Damns on the discovery Yesterday, I over-estimated the height of the air damn/bumper caps on our '95 Discovery and crunched it into a snowbank while making a tight turn. I was able to pull the corner back out without trouble. Has anyone followed the instructions in the message from a couple of months back on removing the airdam and trimming the bumper caps? I'm curious about how to trim the caps. I have a jig saw, if that sounds like the way to go. ( Damn silly air dams anyways! - we want Approach Angle! :) Also, we are approaching 13K miles on the discovery and I would like to switch to synthetic oils in the diffs, transmission ( 5-speed manual ) and engine. Has anyone made this conversion and what brands have you selected? Also, have you observed any improvement in fuel economy? John Antram rewt@sover.net RR 3 Box 888 Middlebury, VT 05753 1972 Land Rover Series III 88", sunrooves (badly improvised by PO), Red 1995 Land Rover Discovery, 5-speed, sunrooves, Roman Bronze 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300SDL, Anthracite Gray ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 12:01:47 -0500 From: Shaun Carrigan <shaunc@infi.net> Subject: Re: Range Rover Speedometers The speedometer became erratic and the odometer failed on my '88 RR at 100,000 miles. The dealership replaced the speedo cable. At 130,000 miles, the odometer froze again with a clicking like you describe. I dismantled the dash just enough to get my hands on where the cable runs into the angle piece and gave it a couple of good hard tugs. That fixed it. At 134,000 miles and climbing, Shaun Carrigan > I don't want to buy another speedometer unless I have to. THe symptoms > this one is displaying are the same as the failure of the original [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] > 87 RR with noisy speedo > 87 RR with quiet speedo ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 15:10:07 -0500 (EST)
From: rovah@agate.net (John Cassidy IV)
John asked,
> Also, we are approaching 13K miles on the discovery and I would
>like to switch to synthetic oils in the diffs, transmission ( 5-speed manual )
>and engine. Has anyone made this conversion and what brands have you
>selected? Also, have you observed any improvement in fuel economy?
My wife's '95 Disco just hit 14,500 miles and at the last oil change
we switched to Mobil-1 10W-30 in the engine. I've been running it in my
'87 RR since last year without a problem(read increased leaks). It's more
expensive, but Mobil recommends to change the filter 3,000 miles after the
change and then change the oil again at 6,000 miles intervals.
Cheers! John Cassidy
1987 RR
1995 Disco
1966 IIA SWB Petrol
------------------------------
[ <- Message 9 -> end
| Table of Contents
| <- Digest 960303 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 16:39:21 -0700 (MST) From: Tebbin Salvesen <tsalves@slcpl.slcpl.lib.ut.us> Subject: Re: Hella's one question reguarding upgrading lights-did you experience any voltage prob. when upping the wattage? I run 85 watt bulbs in my driving lamps but have wondered if I should put in a bigger relay to handle the power. thanks! ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 16:51:21 -0700 (MST) From: Tebbin Salvesen <tsalves@slcpl.slcpl.lib.ut.us> Subject: Re: Range Rover Speedometers On Sat, 2 Mar 1996, Shaun Carrigan wrote: you guys are lucky! ive replaced my speedo 3 times! the third one packed it in with 19000 on it so i gave up who needs a speedo anyway! cheers > The speedometer became erratic and the odometer failed on my '88 RR at > 100,000 miles. The dealership replaced the speedo cable. At 130,000 [ truncated by lro-digester (was 18 lines)] > > 87 RR with noisy speedo > > 87 RR with quiet speedo ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 19:17:12 -0700 From: "Lee Zeltzer" <lzeltzer@isdnet.com> Subject: Arizona dedication of Great Western Trail Thought This might be of interest to some: Date: 29 Feb 1996 16:14:10 -0700 From: "Terry Heslin" <theslin@prpo01.pr.state.az.us> Subject: Arizona's Great Western Trail Arizona's Great Western Trail (GWT) will take a huge step toward realization on Saturday, April 20, 1996 at 10:00 AM Arizona time. The Arizona State Association of 4x4 Clubs, Arizona State Parks OHV Program, Tonto National Forest, The Great Western Trail Association, Arizona Game and Fish and the Bureau of Land Management will be celebrating the dedication of the first official 10 mile segment of the GWT, which is the Bulldog Canyon Trail from the Blue Point Bridge on the Bush Highway to Apache Junction. We will have a ribbon cutting, entertainment, and a 4x4 run to mark the historic event. And naturally you are invited to join the fun!! If you saw the November 1995 edition of Arizona Highways magazine you read the story "Carving Out a Trail for Backroad Adventurers" which featured the GWT. The Arizona GWT will connect backroads from Mexico to the Utah border and beyond to Canada. Arizona's portion will connect nearly 800 miles of dirt roads, everything from high clearance (4x4 needed only as backup) to very technical 3+ rock crawling. Dedicated 4x4 enthusiasts have been working on this awesome idea for years, and April 20 will be the historic day when all that work starts to pay off in the form of an official designation of the GWT. This is a bit of good news to counter the alarming amount of road closures on public land. I'm working on getting a flyer posted on the web to give folks a little more detail on the event. It will be posted on Arizona State Parks Home Page at http://www.pr.state.az.us/Default.html and on the Arizona State Association of Four Wheel Drive Clubs Home Page and/or other off-highway vehicle pages. If you are interested you may also contact me on e-mail at theslin@pr.state.az.us and I'll send you a flyer in the snail mail. Additionally the Arizona Chapter of the Great Western Trail Association is soliciting sponsorship for the dedication, and individual memberships in the Association, of course I can connect interested parties with the volunteers heading up the event. Happy Trails ==Terry Heslin== Arizona State Parks OHV Program Coordinator -- Lee Zeltzer, Senior Consultant Innovative System Design 100 N. Stone Ave. #605 Tucson, AZ 85701 lzeltzer@isdnet.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 20:05:49 -0700 From: "Lee Zeltzer" <lzeltzer@isdnet.com> Subject: Re: Hella's ericz@cloud9.net wrote: > On Fri, 1 Mar 1996, KKelly6788@aol.com wrote: > >Before anyone runs out and buys new aux lamps for a Range Rover you might [ truncated by lro-digester (was 15 lines)] > e-mail me and I'll see if I can find where I got them. > Regards, > Eric I would be very interested in a source. Thanks. -- Lee Zeltzer, Senior Consultant Innovative System Design 100 N. Stone Ave. #605 Tucson, AZ 85701 lzeltzer@isdnet.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: GElam30092@aol.com Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 22:21:11 -0500 Subject: Re: portable winches In a message dated 96-03-02 07:37:59 EST, dmccor03@counsel.com (David McCormack -- Hinshaw ^ Culbertson - Brookfield) writes: >Cons: less secure mounting point for the winch (in >theory anyway); convenience, since every time one winches they >have to drag the winch out of the vehicle; and the inevitable >getting stuck the one time you decide not to bring the winch >along. Hmmmmmm. I don't think the theory holds as to your point about less secure mounting point. I have the Warn setup from RN and the front receiver is extremelly well built. It can be installed by one person but two is better since you have to line up the bumper and the front receiver and get two bolts through them. My only regret is that I didn't shop around. I may be incorrect but I believe the Warn setup can be purchased just about anywhere. The front receiver is another story. Hope this helps.... Gerry "Phoenix, AZ" Elam ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: 73363.427@compuserve.com
Date: 02 Mar 96 23:58:09 EST
Subject: Bumper Stickers
I forgot who first mentioned making bumper stickers, but their is a member of
our club (SoLaRos) who has recently started his own graphic arts company, after
several years in the business. He has printed several T-shirts for us, along
with Mugs, decals and other stuff. He is willing to print up whatever we need,
at a very good price. If anyone is interested let me know and I will get started
on it.
-------------------
| | |
| _ _ ____|____ _ _ | Rob Dennis
O |[___|>>>>>>>>>|___]| O 73363.427@Compuserve.com
\____===_=====_===____/ Atlanta, GA USA
|oo |(_)###(_)| oo| (404) 875-4537
| | ### | |
| | ####### | | 1972 SerIII 88
|_____|_#######_|_____| 1990 RangeRover
[_______________________]
EEEI EEEI
Send By: Rob Dennis 73363.427@Compuserve.com
On 02-Mar-1996
------------------------------
[ <- Message 15 -> end
| Table of Contents
| <- Digest 960303 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]From: PurnellJE@aol.com Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 08:49:24 -0500 Subject: Re: Hella's In a message dated 96-03-02 10:22:24 EST, you write: >Definitely agree. I started with lucas incadescent, upgraded to Hella >halogens and finally I have H4 lamps. The H4 setup is not Hella, however, with a >great savings in money. They are knockoffs named 'Autopal' but have the same lens >and use Hella bulbs. They cost about $25 each, complete. If anyone is >interested, e-mail me and I'll see if I can find where I got them. >Regards, >Eric If you come across the info Eric, I'd like it. After thinking about those Hella Vision headlamps, seeing your 25$ estimate against the 43.50 for the Hellas is very intriguing. thanks, John. D90 ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 15 lines 738 [forwarded 104 whitespace 151] Output: lines 622 [content 384 forwarded 58 (cut 46) whitespace 139] Additional Information: In addition so subscribing and unsubscribing, the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) file and the last month of daily digests may be retrieved (by mail) from majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net Useful commands for this are 'index uk-lro-digest' which returns a list of files available, as well as 'get lro-digest <filename>', etc. Range Rover World Wide Web Sites start at Range Rover Register: http://www.apricot.co.uk/rel3/directory/rrr/index.html RoverWeb: http://www.ridgecrest.ca.us/RoverWeb/ Other: http://www.OpenMarket.com/personal/caloccia/lr/pages.html Lloyd's http://www.cs.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tildeLand-Rover/ If Major Domo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net -B[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960303 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]