[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

msgSender linesSubject
1 Peter Bradley [hm50@dial14YDNP repairs
2 Chris Marsden [Byway@com31Moelfre City & Old Radnorshire roads.
Majordomo About the digest
------------------------------ [ Message 1 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970317 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]


Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 20:49:42 +0000
From: Peter Bradley <hm50@dial.pipex.com>
Subject: YDNP repairs

I have just been advised by the returning recce party:

The following roads have been "repaired" (acceptably)

Cam Road / West Cam - widened and surface improvement
Busk Lane Raydale - surface improvement
Cam High - surface improvement, new signage "Byway"

Peter Bradley

------------------------------
[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970317 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 18:12:51 -0500
From: Chris Marsden <Byway@compuserve.com>
Subject: Moelfre City & Old Radnorshire roads.

Hi,

We stumbled across some scenic roads today with decades of neglect,
impassable, but easily achievable on Green Lane day.

On one a farmer gave in interesting clue to the Powys reticence to accept
the Early LoS as being public roads.

There are a *large* number of UCRs on an early road map AND the early LoS. 
Jeremy Atkinson has discovered them, and Powys tried hard to prevent them
becoming public.  They know it is now in the public domain but requested he
did not go public or use them yet.  I summised the problem may have been
fears of claims against them by prospective purchasors being told at search
there were no UCRs when there were.

The farmer today said "We were asked by the CC 20 years ago, if were we
willing to maintain the roads, or do you want them closed down?"  "After
that quite a lot were closed down by the CC" (But  Not with 116)  "But last
year they asked us if they can open these old roads up?  some farmers have
said yes if you replace the gates or fences etc, others have said no!"

Now is this idle chatter, or could it really have happened like this?   I
have seen a few of these UCRs, and it could be quite dramatic if they had
to re-instate all of them on their LoS.

Chris.

------------------------------
[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970317 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

  END OF * LIST DIGEST 
 Input:  messages 2 lines 69 [forwarded 0 whitespace 16]
 Output: lines 101 [content 32  forwarded 0 (cut  0) whitespace 16]
[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970317 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]