[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
| msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
| 1 | TimLARA@aol.com | 12 | Re: RUPP Reclass |
| 2 | Chris Marsden [Byway@com | 16 | Inclosures in the Wild West |
| 3 | srawlings@cix.compulink. | 41 | Re: RUPP Reclass |
| Majordomo | About the digest |
From: TimLARA@aol.com Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 13:38:13 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: RUPP Reclass Not judicial review, not Lincs, but a RUPP in Norfolk that went down to Bridleway 'because vehicle use was illegal' and objections have gone in for a second PI. Breckland LRC seem to have been almost the only users. Come on TRF and WADC, where are you? Cheers, tim ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970328 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 16:10:06 -0500 From: Chris Marsden <Byway@compuserve.com> Subject: Inclosures in the Wild West Hi If you ever run out of roads to discover, try Powys. Had an interesting afternoon, on the Ednol & Kinnerton Inclosure award. I was wondering why the were three Public Carriage roads marked A. Then I worked out that they were each for each parish, and a third parish tucked in as well. One had A-E the next A - G, and the last A - Q most of them not shown as having any status or only bridleway now, and that was just one of many, possibly never investigated awards. Chris ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970328 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 97 22:45 GMT0
From: srawlings@cix.compulink.co.uk (Stephen Rawlings)
Subject: Re: RUPP Reclass
The TRF has always been a bit thin on the ground in that area as you know
Tim. AIR, the last group over there folded. I had a long chat with the
RoW bod some time back when I wanted to do some riding in the area. He
was very depressed about the lack of support he got. Same old story!
BTW, there was another follow up piece in FN about the article I faxed
you. If I can get and photocopy it, I will fax you. Did you respond to
the original article?
Steve Rawlings
-------- Original Message --------
>From TimLARA@aol.com Thu Mar 27 18:39:21 1997
tom.compulink.co.uk (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA09258; Thu, 27 Mar
1997 18:39:21 GMT
by playground.sun.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA12994
for <RoW@playground.sun.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 10:38:45 -0800
(PST)
by emout14.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0)
id NAA23495;
Thu, 27 Mar 1997 13:38:13 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 13:38:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <970327133806_-2073351306@emout14.mail.aol.com>
Subject: Re: RUPP Reclass
From: TimLARA@aol.com
Not judicial review, not Lincs, but a RUPP in Norfolk that went down to
Bridleway 'because vehicle use was illegal' and objections have gone in
for a
second PI.
Breckland LRC seem to have been almost the only users. Come on TRF and
WADC,
where are you?
Cheers, tim
------------------------------
[ <- Message 4 -> end
| Table of Contents
| <- Digest 970328 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 3 lines 105 [forwarded 2 whitespace 19] Output: lines 128 [content 52 forwarded 2 (cut 0) whitespace 19][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970328 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]