msg	Sender	lines	Subject
1	TimLARA@aol.com	53	Fwd: Misdirected e-mail - message
2	doghouse@cix.compulink.c	10	Land Rover involvement
3	Chris Marsden [Byway@com	30	Parish politics
	Majordomo		About the digest

------------------------------ [ Message 1 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970502 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]

From: TimLARA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 11:47:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Fwd: Misdirected e-mail - message

No, No do not remove us from your e-mail address. The e-mail are for a
magazine
that is within this building "Off Road and 4 Wheel Drive" in fact we have 26
magazines in ths building but I did not understand the context of your
e-mails
due to them not being titled "Off Road and Four Wheel Drive " etc. If you
want
to keep sending e-mails here that is fine just label them clearly and we will
pass them on to the relevsnt department.

Sorry for the mix up and we shall look forward to getting the rest of your
mail
!

Regards

Samantha at Boating Publications
101574.216@CompuServe.COM

Forwarded by Tim Stevens - I am not sure who needs this so you are all
getting it.
---------------------
Forwarded message:
From:	101574.216@CompuServe.COM (Boating Publications)
To:	TimLARA@aol.com (INTERNET:TimLARA@aol.com)
Date: 97-05-01 09:45:46 EDT

Dear Tim

No, No do not remove us from your e-mail address. The e-mail are for a
magazine
that is within this building "Off Road and 4 Wheel Drive" in fact we have 26
magazines in ths building but I did not understand the context of your
e-mails
due to them not being titled "Off Road and Four Wheel Drive " etc. If you
want
to keep sending e-mails here that is fine just label them clearly and we will
pass them on to the relevsnt department.

Sorry for the mix up and we shall look forward to getting the rest of your
mail
!

Regards

Samantha

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 May 97 23:14 BST-1
From: doghouse@cix.compulink.co.uk (Michael Dyer)
Subject: Land Rover involvement

....dont exspect *any* financial help from Land Rover, they have the 
opinion that laning is non-PC, I have personal experience weith the 
North-to-South Run.

:-) Mick Dyer

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 03:29:20 -0400
From: Chris Marsden <Byway@compuserve.com>
Subject: Parish politics

Tim,
Brian Ashcroft has tried to get his parish to veto the 116 for Hill House
Lane. The Clerk to the parish, a salaried non-elected job I understand,
said at the meeting earlier this week, We had a letter from the CC on about
27/3/97,  saying they HAD to make a decision in 5 days on whether to
support the downgrading of this UCR to bridlway.    Therefore thay rang
round a few people, including Sir Simon Gourlay, a land owner for half the
length of the lane.  The clerk then rang the parish councillors who all
agreed to recommend downgrading.  Brian had already writen to the chair
saying he wanted to discuss the topic at the meeting, and had a number of
people there to support him, including our friend Wilf Morris the landowner
for the other half of the lane.

They did not consult Wilf M, but he had already written to the CC saying he
did not want it closed. The CC have said they will not close it as the
landowners have an absolute veto.  Bob Lloyd also said he has NOT written
to Parish nor has anyone else giving them any deadline.   Brian humiliated
the Parish Councillors at the meeting and forced them to appologise.   

His question is, assuming they can produce no letter, and at least the
clerk has lied, and they have acted undemocratically, who can he complain
to and what action can he take to create maximum embarassment and possible
resignations?

Chris

------------------------------

  END OF * LIST DIGEST 
 Input:  messages 3 lines 124 [forwarded 0 whitespace 26]
 Output: lines 153 [content 72  forwarded 0 (cut  0) whitespace 26]