[ First Message | | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
| Message | Sender | lines | Subject |
| 1 | Stephen Somers [stephen. | 25 | Re: Tim Stevens |
| 2 | "Dave Tilbury" [Dave@han | 13 | Re: local plan |
| 3 | "Andrew Rowbottom" [rumm | 32 | Old (post 1924) OS map of Manchester free to good home |
| 4 | Susan Jeggo [derek.sue@v | 11 | Re: local plan |
| 5 | Susan Jeggo [derek.sue@v | 21 | Re: local plan |
| 6 | Susan Jeggo [derek.sue@v | 22 | (lack of) local plan again. |
| 7 | "Dave Tilbury" [Dave@han | 17 | Re: E5221, OSS response to Warks. |
| 8 | "Dave Tilbury" [Dave@han | 23 | Fw: Fw: motorcyclist girlfreinds |
| 9 | "Dave Tilbury" [Dave@han | 32 | Re: HA PROW Web pages |
| 10 | TimLARA@aol.com | 20 | Re: Tim Stevens |
| 11 | alan kind [alan@highwaym | 23 | Re: HA PROW Web pages |
| Majordomo | About the digest |
From: Stephen Somers <stephen.somers@virgin.net> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 10:12:10 -0800 Subject: Re: Tim Stevens TimLARA@aol.com wrote: More or less exactly what you ended up doing. Extremely tedious and frustrating (what isn't with Windows?) but necessary (I speak as a professional computer techie). HOWEVER, you should always badger the support service of the maker of your PC when dealing with a problem. This was reinforced for me only this week in connection with a Dell machine. After spending something like 40 hours over a four week period I finally emailed Dell and received the info that 'oh, we know about that one, download the fix from our site'. (spit, spit, gnashing of teeth) -- Steve Somers (Project Leader) '75 Land Rover 101" Forward Control, 1-Tonne, General Service (62FL50 - Royal Artillery/2 Commando) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Dave Tilbury" <Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 17:09:31 -0000 Subject: Re: local plan If not available for inspection where stated during the relevant period you are on a winner if you wish to have the slack b-----s do it all again - or even scupper any PI/ confirmation of it. Dave Tilbury Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk http://www.hants-lanes.demon.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Andrew Rowbottom" <rummy@snaffle.demon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 13:39:45 -0000 Subject: Old (post 1924) OS map of Manchester free to good home Hello listies! I seem to remember someone on this list saying that old OS maps could be useful. I've got a "Special Sheet Popular edition One-Inch Map" on cloth of the Manchester area. It says first published 1924 with periodical corrected reprint. If it gives any clues as to age bridlepaths and footpaths are not distinguished on this map. Original cost was Four shillings and sixpence. approx GR's bottom left SJ6371, top left SD6411, bottom right SK2071 top right SE2111 or more crudely Bolton to just above Bakewell. Free to anyone who has a genuine use for it. e-mail me as I don't often have time to read this list. Andrew Rowbottom Geoworks Tel: +44 (0) 1625 503305 Fax: +44 (0) 1625 500650 Email: arowbott@geoworks.co.uk Web: http://www.geoworks.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Susan Jeggo <derek.sue@virgin.net> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 15:59:56 +0000 Subject: Re: local plan Faxed my objection/complaint about there failure last night, today on my answerphone is a message that after 6.30 tonight there will be a copy in my local library. I will be on the library door step at 6.31. Dave Tilbury wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Susan Jeggo <derek.sue@virgin.net> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 18:56:34 +0000 Subject: Re: local plan Rob Smith wrote: > I could tell you, but you're a lady... thanks Rob :>) > As you are probably aware the 'local plan' and the DM&S are different. The > local plan says what can & can't be done planning wise in an area, it can > give hints about what is likely to happen to RoW, but not always. Yes, but I respond to anything I can, they dont put user friendly policies in for anything other than walkers and cyclist. Especially when they keep building on RoW. Sue - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Susan Jeggo <derek.sue@virgin.net> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:00:38 +0000 Subject: (lack of) local plan again. well, I got there at 6.35 and, guess what? no sign of the local plan. I am a placid person. Now they are starting to irritate me. Faxed my objection/complaint about there failure last night, today on my answerphone is a message that after 6.30 tonight there will be a copy in my local library. I will be on the library door step at 6.31. Dave Tilbury wrote: > If not available for inspection where stated during the relevant period you > are on a winner if you wish to have the slack b-----s do it all again - or > even scupper any PI/ confirmation of it. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Dave Tilbury" <Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 11:52:00 -0000 Subject: Re: E5221, OSS response to Warks. <<But for those of us in the know there is the local shop for a Mars Bar >> But surely a local shop is for local people ... "Now, what's all this? We'll not have any trouble here. This is a local shop ..." Dave Tilbury Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk http://www.hants-lanes.demon.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Dave Tilbury" <Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 11:14:02 -0000 Subject: Fw: Fw: motorcyclist girlfreinds I thought this response worthy of a wider audience!! Dave Tilbury Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk http://www.hants-lanes.demon.co.uk ---------- > From: Spikerchds@aol.com > To: Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk > Subject: Re: Fw: motorcyclist girlfreinds > Date: 16 February 1999 20:39 > Excellent site..added to fav places list..but whats wrong with the pic? At > least he picked a good looking one. > G > Subject: Re: Fw: motorcyclist girlfreinds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Dave Tilbury" <Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 12:33:47 -0000 Subject: Re: HA PROW Web pages <<Those of you interested in Hampshire BOATs could do worse than take a look at Hampshire CC's web site, which advertises its agenda for the next Rights of Way panel,>> Last meeting!! << including proposals to delete an un-numbered BOAT between Sky End Lane, Hordle and Road A337 from the DM&S,>> Refused. <<and to impose TROs on East Meon BOAT No. 42; Liss BOAT No. 15; Newton Valence BOAT No. 30 and Colemore and Priors Dean BOAT No. 22.>> The TROs are already in place but were temporary. Now to be made permanent. Not a problem as they only relate to 4x4s - who, as previously stated, make little or no contribution to the debate (in Hants), and therefore loose out. Has anyone a larger wooden spoon I could use? Dave Tilbury Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk http://www.hants-lanes.demon.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TimLARA@aol.com Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 15:01:48 EST Subject: Re: Tim Stevens In a message dated 17/02/99 10:13:51 GMT Standard Time, stephen.somers@virgin.net writes: << HOWEVER, you should always badger the support service of the maker of your PC when dealing with a problem. >> I did, but he was doing his proper job. And half the problem kit was not his anyway. There is a down side to getting a mate of a mate to knock something together, but the downside of buying a real professional outfit is that as soon as you change anything you are basck on your own. And anyway, the last 'expert' I had look at it, took two days to make no progress, and gave up in disgust. That was a different problem though (or was it ...?) Cheers, tim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: alan kind <alan@highwayman.demon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 20:36:52 +0000 Subject: Re: HA PROW Web pages In message <bulk.11034.19990217110639@Land-Rover.Team.Net>, Dave Tilbury <Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk> writes ><<Those of you interested in Hampshire BOATs could do worse than take a >look >at Hampshire CC's web site, which advertises its agenda for the next Rights >of Way panel,>> >Last meeting!! [ truncated by list-digester (was 13 lines)] >End Lane, Hordle and Road A337 from the DM&S,>> >Refused. Presumably using a s116? <Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk> writes -- alan kind - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 11 lines 439 [forwarded 45 whitespace 0] Output: lines 327 [content 226 forwarded 40 (cut 5) whitespace 0][ First | | <- Digest 990218 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]