[ First Message | Table of Contents | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
| Message | Sender | lines | Subject |
| 1 | "Dave Tilbury" [Dave@han | 17 | Re: OS explorers |
| 2 | howard.neal@which.net | 16 | Re: bewdley/stourport bywayDevil's S TRO |
| 3 | howard.neal@which.net | 32 | Re: MP Bennett |
| 4 | howard.neal@which.net | 16 | Re: HA PROW Web pages |
| 5 | Chris Marsden [Byway@com | 21 | Re: bewdley/stourport bywayDevil's S TRO |
| 6 | Chris Marsden [Byway@com | 47 | Re: MP Bennett |
| 7 | "Dave Tilbury" [Dave@han | 16 | Re: MP Bennett |
| 8 | winchesterld@cix.compuli | 17 | Re: 20 years of B&B |
| 9 | winchesterld@cix.compuli | 16 | Re: MP Bennett |
| 10 | winchesterld@cix.compuli | 17 | Re: 20 years of B&B |
| 11 | Brian Lewis [brian@limb. | 20 | Re: OS explorers |
| Majordomo | About the digest |
From: "Dave Tilbury" <Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 10:04:24 -0000 Subject: Re: OS explorers you'll probably all say YES!>> No point in worrying about something that you cannot currently influence. If you went to the County they would tell you to bog off - and outside interest is just as likely to make the CC more cautious - could work either way. And the OS will tell you bog off both before and after the event. I would love to be wrong. Dave Tilbury Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk http://www.hants-lanes.demon.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: howard.neal@which.net Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 10:28:36 +0000 Subject: Re: bewdley/stourport bywayDevil's S TRO > but a scramble bike not being a road bike, and not taxed as > such, is therefore not in law, a Motor Vehicle. NO prosecution can be > brought under the Road Traffic Act for riding such a motorcycle on the > highway. Wouldn't this apply to such bikes used on the Ridgeway? Regards, Howard - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: howard.neal@which.net Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 10:46:29 +0000 Subject: Re: MP Bennett > Rendel/David My father voted for this twit. He muttered last week that.. 'The man seems good for nothing apart from appearing in photographs'. He is getting a bit of stick in the local press at the moment. Poor chap. (Rendel not my Dad!) > there are designated and appropriate areas for the use of recreational > off-road motor vehicles. Rendel said this in a NWN interview (could have been scripted by Gloom). Designated areas? > A bit of political campaigning needed? Started locally. > Only if you want to save green lanes from the lies of gleam and relentless > tractor damage. I think we will have to put together a presentation showing how much green lane damage is caused by sources other than recreational users. Gardiner has one that he hawks around local Ramblers groups. Regards, Howard - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: howard.neal@which.net Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 10:34:02 +0000 Subject: Re: HA PROW Web pages > Soon be time for work again, you can take it easy them! Just switch the > landing lights on and put yer feet up. Did you hear about the chap who went to bed and left the landing light on? He woke up and found the hall full of aeroplanes! Regards, Howard - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Chris Marsden <Byway@compuserve.com> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 18:07:26 -0500 Subject: Re: bewdley/stourport bywayDevil's S TRO > > but a scramble bike not being a road bike, and not taxed as > > such, is therefore not in law, a Motor Vehicle. NO prosecution can be > > brought under the Road Traffic Act for riding such a motorcycle on the > > highway. > Wouldn't this apply to such bikes used on the Ridgeway? > > highway. Yes. If I am right in saying the riders can not be prosecuted under the RTA as they are not road vehicles. What remedies are avaliable? (Especially if there is not a L/O as such, ie it is a publicly owned road, say an IA Pb CR) Chris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Chris Marsden <Byway@compuserve.com> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 18:07:23 -0500 Subject: Re: MP Bennett > I think we will have to put together a presentation showing how much green > lane damage is caused by sources other than recreational users. Gardiner has > one that he hawks around local Ramblers groups. Yes, the whole package needs to be put together, carefully. Several headings:- Leisure users cause virtually no damage That agriculture is responsible for substantial amounts of damage That everyone is entitled to Access to the Countryside by their chosen method, so longs as the rights of others are not unreasonably degraded Most opposition come from those who would financially gain from suppression of other's rights Gloom has not preserved any lanes. The varied nature of the countryside is enhanced by a multitude of different ways. Green lanes used only by leisure users are in better condition than those used by agriculture, or unused. Carriageways will not survive looking like traditional carriageways with such use. A considerable net benefit accrues from the use of lanes, ie clearance, prevention of obstructions. Bullet points along these lines should be in letters sent by anyone interested in usable lanes surviving, with a full detailed information pack, backed up by photographs to prove the point, rubbish the gloom lies and fictitious claims. The evidence will rely heavily on MBoB, and other independent reports, council minutes, CoCo, CLA quotes and other useful sources. What I can not understand is what drives the obsessed zealots on. What does dunlop gardiner still mills get out of it. plumbe and perhaps dunlop makes oodles of dosh, but the others don't get rich on the subs at £6, although for that you only get two propaganda sheets sent each year. Obviously the average member does not have much to do with the lobbying! Chris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Dave Tilbury" <Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 10:17:09 -0000 Subject: Re: MP Bennett <<Some politicians get lured along green lanes ... when they're in the middle of delivering leaflets for major by-elections.>> With their 4x4 covered in "vote for" stickers and they still get elected. There is a lesson to be learned hear that Mr Hunter, Key, et al should head!! Dave Tilbury Dave@hants-lanes.demon.co.uk http://www.hants-lanes.demon.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: winchesterld@cix.compulink.co.uk (Rodney Sabine) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 99 06:29 GMT0 Subject: Re: 20 years of B&B > I heard today from within HCC that the leader of the, Council Freddy > Emery-Wallace, a councillor that neither lives or works (AFAIK) within > the > County, has let is be known, on a number of occasions, that he wants > mountain bikes banned from Hampshire's RoW. He'll have to get a move on - I doubt very much if he'll be leader after the HCC Annual meeting in May. His own side hate him more than the opposition (but not as mich as me) Rodney Sabine, Alresford, Hampshire - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: winchesterld@cix.compulink.co.uk (Rodney Sabine) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 99 06:29 GMT0 Subject: Re: MP Bennett > A bit of political campainging needed? Yes - especially amongst Lib Dem and Labour by the look of that list - interesting group. We need one of our organisations to be as pro-active as GLEAM. Trouble is that no MP likes to be seen with 4X4s. Our local MP, whose election campaign I ran, wouldn't even be photographed with some disabled people using 4X4s. Still, at least the didn't sign the GLEAM motion, so I must have had some effect on him. Rodney Sabine, Alresford, Hampshire - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: winchesterld@cix.compulink.co.uk (Rodney Sabine) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 99 06:29 GMT0 Subject: Re: 20 years of B&B > Check your Representation of the Peoples Act: To stand for election you > must reside in the area in which the election is being held. We have > one of these on our District Council, but checking reveals he has a > 'pied a terre' here. I would be surprised if Mr Emery-Wallace wasn't > covered. Been there done that. The Act actually says 'reside or work'. Freddy was a member of the old Hampshire pre re-organisation. Hence, as a County Councillor, he worked in Winchester - so he's eligible. Sadly. Rodney Sabine, Alresford, Hampshire - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Brian Lewis <brian@limb.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 09:10:40 +0000 Subject: Re: OS explorers In message <bulk.29749.19990219171711@Land-Rover.Team.Net>, Chris Marsden <Byway@compuserve.com> writes >I asked about a whole list of examples, and of course got no definite >reply, the next question some one could ask is:- >Do you use the county road map OR the LIST of Streets? >If both, and there is a discrepancy, what do you do? There is a sign up in the Landcharge off above the county road maps, it says in so many words:- This maps are not accurate!!! so how do they maintain them if they do not know where they are? Brian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 11 lines 432 [forwarded 38 whitespace 0] Output: lines 351 [content 242 forwarded 38 (cut 0) whitespace 0][ First | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990221 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]