[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
| msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
| 1 | "Geoff Wilkin" [geoff.wi | 5 | Re: Glow plugs |
| 2 | doghouse@cix.compulink.c | 13 | Re: Lighting regs |
| 3 | "Michael Wells" [mwells1 | 12 | Cable woes |
| 4 | "Mel Mauger & Matthew Re | 20 | Re: Jeremy Fearn intercoolers |
| 5 | "Mel Mauger & Matthew Re | 23 | Re: diesel fuel filters |
| 6 | Leigh Ryder [leigh@tcpub | 16 | Re: TYRO rules |
| 7 | "Mel Mauger & Matthew Re | 68 | Re: was re: charging times, now lighting regulations |
| 8 | "Mel Mauger & Matthew Re | 25 | Re: Lighting regs |
| 9 | "Mel Mauger & Matthew Re | 48 | Re: was re: charging times, now lighting regulations |
| 10 | "Mel Mauger & Matthew Re | 16 | Re: 101 dimensions |
| Majordomo | About the digest |
From: "Geoff Wilkin" <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 09:29:23 -0000 Subject: Re: Glow plugs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: doghouse@cix.compulink.co.uk (Michael Dyer) Date: Sun, 17 Jan 99 10:35 GMT0 Subject: Re: Lighting regs My understanding is that roof-lights _must_ be independently wired and are not legally usable on road. This is not the same as 'illegal to fit'. Its logical, an oncoming car the other side of a hill will have the benefit of your roof lights long before you see him and can dip your beams. :-) Mick Dyer (doghouse@cix) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Michael Wells" <mwells11@rjt.co.uk> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 11:38:11 -0000 Subject: Cable woes I have recently fitted a 2.25 to my 86" and I had to fit an old cable lying around the garage. This gets very stiff and I would like to change it. Has anyone any ideas on a suitable replacement which can be adapted to the rovers set up. Also has anyone had a problem with bird droppings rotting their canvas, I think I have as I have now 4 holes in my two year old hood. Mick 86" in Norfolk. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mel Mauger & Matthew Reeve" <blatchwood@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 16:34:37 -0000 Subject: Re: Jeremy Fearn intercoolers >One thing to remember is that generally the boost is set below spec on most >of the turboed LR's that I've looked at, and just setting the boost to the >book will give some small benefit, as will getting the injection pump >properly set up. Is it a DIY job to set the boost or is it a specialist job, same with the injection pump. If it is a specialist job, how much is it likely to cost? My 300Tdi is way down on power and I'm fast running out of things to do to get the power back. Matthew UK, nr Heathrow 1979 2-dr Range Rover 300Tdi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mel Mauger & Matthew Reeve" <blatchwood@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 16:36:52 -0000 Subject: Re: diesel fuel filters >many, many hours later we made it. We had repeated problems with power >loss/fuel starvation which I eventually traced to the 'fine gauze filter' >in the fuel tank. The diesel was clogging it up and with the heavy load >requiring more fuel it just couldn't cope. >Dave Ladell Well the gauze was blocked, and is now gone - I also reconnected the wires to the sender unit and I've even got a little green light now which tells me when I'm low on fuel !!! Unfortunately it didn't help the loss of power :-(( Oh well, at least it's one possible cause crossed off the list. Matthew UK, nr Heathrow 1979 2-dr Range Rover 300Tdi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Leigh Ryder <leigh@tcpub.demon.co.uk> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 19:20:54 +0000 Subject: Re: TYRO rules In article <bulk.11674.19990116150804@Land-Rover.Team.Net>, Dave White <dave@bang.demon.co.uk> writes I have the ARC rules if you would like them. >My club (Humberside - www.bang.demon.co.uk\humberover) are looking for a set >of rules for TYRO (I don't even know what it stands for but it is less >damaging than RTV for really shiny vehicles). Can anyone here help? -- Leigh Ryder - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mel Mauger & Matthew Reeve" <blatchwood@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 18:15:59 -0000 Subject: Re: was re: charging times, now lighting regulations >I'll willingly give you the 2 UKP if you can point me at a website or UK Gov. >Doc that defines the legal requirements. Statutory Instruments 1989 No. 1796 Road Traffic The Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989 Made 28th September 1989 Laid before parliament 11th October 1989 Coming into force 1st November 1989 This will be available from your library - I believe it's part of the Vehicle Construction and Use Regulations although it doesn't say that on the front cover but that is how it was requested from the library. >You quote a lot of stats but you don't say from where they come. See above >I'm not trying to be funny ... this is relevant to me. I rarely try to be funny, I find that if you try too hard it doesn't work anyway :-)) >e.g., you say "With a post 1986 vehicle, you are restricted to the primary >lights having BS standard markings, which limit you to wattage and beam >pattern." The details of the British Standards are not included within the regulations, and as they don't apply to my vehicle (by age) I didn't research it, however (and I don't have any specifics on this) for a lamp/bulb etc. to pass the appropriate British Standard they must have a suitable beam pattern and be limited by wattage, in other words a 90/130w headlamp bulb wouldn't pass the standard, neither would one of the older headlamp units which hasn't got the same cut-off that newer lamps have. >If you can't expand upon this can you point me at the place where I might >find such specific info ? As ever, ask the information desk at your local library, they probably won't have the regulations on the shelf (unless it's a main library) but they will be able to order them. Make sure (if you have a later vehicle) that you also request any amendments which may be in force. If you find anything which contradicts anything I've said here then please let me (and the list) know. As far as I can tell, the onus is on the driver of the vehicle to be responsible in usage, rather than to be restricted by numbers and beam patterns, except for later vehicles which are restricted. The reason why the earlier vehicle are not restricted (as I understand it) is that the regulations cannot be enforced (easily at least) retrospectively on older vehicles. I hope this helps, feel free to contact me if you want any more help. Matthew UK, nr Heathrow 1979 2-dr Range Rover 300Tdi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mel Mauger & Matthew Reeve" <blatchwood@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 18:18:24 -0000 Subject: Re: Lighting regs >My understanding is that roof-lights _must_ be independently wired and are >not legally usable on road. This is not the same as 'illegal to fit'. >Its logical, an oncoming car the other side of a hill will have the >benefit of your roof lights long before you see him and can dip your beams. >:-) Mick Dyer (doghouse@cix) Why would you have lights on the roof aimed at the horizon, as Frank has often stated the only advantage of lights on the roof as opposed to on the bumper is to illuminate holes in the track immediately in front of you. Anyway, the lights you've currently got on your bumper are more than adequate at the moment :-)) Matthew UK, nr Heathrow 1979 2-dr Range Rover 300Tdi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mel Mauger & Matthew Reeve" <blatchwood@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 18:01:36 -0000 Subject: Re: was re: charging times, now lighting regulations > >>>- Vertical - no requirement (therefore roof lights are = >allowed<<< >Matthew, >sorry if I'm being dim (pun intended) but does this mean we can use roof = >lights or not? >Frank As far as use on the road is concerned, roof lights ARE allowed. However, I would not advise it as another requirement is that you do not dazzle other users and, as Mick Dyer pointed out, other users coming over the brow of a hill would be hit by the roof lights before you could see they were there. However, this is merely a restriction on use, in the same way as fog lights can be fitted but restrictions are in force for when they should be used. If roof lights are fitted in the most useful way that they can be, in other words angled steeply downwards to light up holes in front of the vehicle, then you are unlikely to dazzle other road users in the 'brow of the hill' situation, as the resulting pattern will be closer to the vehicle than the standard dipped beam lights. However, these lights will be of virtually no use on tarmaced roads and therefore shouldn't be used as such but ARE technically legal. Please note, I am not advocating the use of roof lights in normal driving conditions, only stating the law as it stands. The important thing to remember is that any lights which you install MUST NOT be used to dazzle other road users, therefore while you can use pretty much any wattage/positioning etc, you are required to be considerate to other road users. This is the requirement which is used on the odd occasion that the police pull people for using their fog lights in broad daylight etc. Matthew UK, nr Heathrow 1979 2-dr Range Rover 300Tdi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mel Mauger & Matthew Reeve" <blatchwood@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 22:19:43 -0000 Subject: Re: 101 dimensions >try Chris Savidge, chairman of the 101 Forward Control Register on 0115 = >926 7716. >Tell him I suggested he might be able to help..... >Frank Cheers Frank, I'll call him as soon as I get a chance at a reasonable hour. Matthew UK, nr Heathrow 1979 2-dr Range Rover 300Tdi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990118 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST
Input: messages 10 lines 453 [forwarded 37 whitespace 0]
Output: lines 301 [content 195 forwarded 37 (cut 0) whitespace 0]
UK/IE Land Rover Owner Additional Information:
In addition so subscribing and unsubscribing, the Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQ) file and the last month of daily digests may be retrieved
(by mail) from majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net
Useful commands for this are 'index uk-lro-digest' which returns a list of
files available, as well as 'get lro-digest <filename>', etc.
UK/EIRE World Wide Web Sites start at
http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/pages.html
(shadow) http://www2.Land-Rover.Team.Net/pages.html
If Major Domo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have
understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net
-B
[ First Message
| Table of Contents
| <- Digest 990118 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]