[ First Message | Table of Contents | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
| Message | Sender | lines | Subject |
| 1 | "Steve Mace" [steve@solw | 33 | Re: Freelander (LANDROVER SPIRIT OF ADVENTURE) |
| 2 | Geoff Wilkin [geoff.wilk | 7 | Re: Mike Hammer(ite) |
| 3 | Geoff Wilkin [geoff.wilk | 7 | Re: Defender 110 CSW |
| 4 | Geoff Wilkin [geoff.wilk | 7 | Re: 2.25 diesel - non starting woes |
| 5 | "Iain Tennant" [i.r.tenn | 30 | Re: intro |
| 6 | gwinston@cisco.com (Grah | 25 | Re: intro |
| 7 | Yves Marchi [yvmarchi@cl | 7 | (pas d'objet) |
| 8 | Orlando_Scott-Cowley@wat | 24 | Disco Lights. (Not, as in Boogie Woogie) |
| 9 | Anthony Cornell-Hewlett | 16 | SCARE MONGERING 'PETROL TAX' |
| 10 | "Baker, Stuart J" [baker | 23 | Re: Instrument panel wiring |
| 11 | John Strang [john.strang | 56 | Neil's HSE |
| 12 | "Peter Estibeiro" [peter | 30 | Re: 2.25 diesel - non starting woes |
| 13 | John Strang [john.strang | 20 | Scare Mongering/Petrol tax |
| 14 | Simon Minshall [simon@ci | 48 | Rear Door/wheel |
| 15 | "Steve Mace" [steve@solw | 21 | Re: SCARE MONGERING 'PETROL TAX' |
| 16 | "Iain Tennant" [i.r.tenn | 21 | Re: intro |
| 17 | "Baker, Stuart J" [baker | 23 | Re: Instrument panel wiring |
| 18 | gwinston@cisco.com (Grah | 30 | Re: intro |
| 19 | Simon Minshall [simon@ci | 48 | Rear Door/wheel |
| 20 | "Iain Tennant" [i.r.tenn | 23 | Re: intro |
| 21 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 25 | Re: Mike Hammer(ite) |
| 22 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 15 | D90/110 engine choice (was: intro) |
| 23 | "Iain Tennant" [i.r.tenn | 29 | Re: Freelander (LANDROVER SPIRIT OF ADVENTURE) |
| 24 | gwinston@cisco.com (Grah | 17 | Re: D90/110 engine choice (was: intro) |
| 25 | "Iain Tennant" [i.r.tenn | 21 | Re: D90/110 engine choice (was: intro) |
| 26 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 14 | Re: D90/110 engine choice (was: intro) |
| 27 | Geoff Wilkin [geoff.wilk | 43 | Oil |
| 28 | Andrew Baker [Andrew_Bak | 17 | RE: Oil |
| 29 | Geoff Wilkin [geoff.wilk | 44 | Re: Cable markings |
| 30 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 16 | RE: Oil |
| 31 | Ian Stuart [ian.stuart@e | 34 | Re: hi-list goes up, not down |
| 32 | Geoff Wilkin [geoff.wilk | 41 | Funny things on bumpers |
| 33 | Andrew Baker [Andrew_Bak | 11 | I'm really getting fed up |
| 34 | "Peter Dowson" [Peter.Do | 31 | Re: Funny things on bumpers |
| 35 | gwinston@cisco.com (Grah | 16 | Re: I'm really getting fed up |
| 36 | Andy Gardiner [101_nut@s | 20 | electric windowss |
| 37 | Andrew Baker [Andrew_Bak | 9 | RE: I'm really getting fed up |
| 38 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 22 | Re: Funny things on bumpers |
| 39 | Geoff Wilkin [geoff.wilk | 7 | Re: Mike Hammer(ite) |
| 40 | M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (M | 12 | Re: electric windowss |
| 41 | Geoff Wilkin [geoff.wilk | 38 | Re: Funny things on bumpers |
| 42 | Geoff Wilkin [geoff.wilk | 7 | Re: Oil |
| 43 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 22 | Cable crimpings (was: Cable markings) |
| 44 | "George Corner" [George@ | 10 | Re: Disco Lights. (Not, as in Boogie Woogie) |
| 45 | "Micky" [micky@big101.fr | 28 | Re: Funny things on bumpers |
| 46 | "Micky" [micky@big101.fr | 27 | Hawkwind, was: Neil's HSE |
| 47 | "Micky" [micky@big101.fr | 57 | Re: Funny things on bumpers |
| 48 | "Richard Clarke"[Richard | 20 | Re: high lift (not) going down |
| 49 | "Richard Clarke"[Richard | 5 | [not specified] |
| 50 | AVAC11@aol.com | 30 | Re: intro |
| 51 | AVAC11@aol.com | 21 | Re: Rear Door/wheel |
| 52 | AVAC11@aol.com | 17 | Re: Funny things on bumpers |
| 53 | "Matthew Reeve & Mel Mau | 22 | Re: LATIN? (no LR content) |
| 54 | Allan Smith [smitha@cand | 23 | Re: Oil |
| 55 | Allan Smith [smitha@cand | 10 | RE: Oil |
| 56 | gwinston@cisco.com (Grah | 29 | Re: intro |
| Majordomo | About the digest |
From: "Steve Mace" <steve@solwise.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 09:00:11 -0000 Subject: Re: Freelander (LANDROVER SPIRIT OF ADVENTURE) Reminds me of a story I heard the other day.... In this area the local health/education authorities have started using taxis as pick up vehicles to take 'special' kids to school and back. One of the taxi drivers who does this was describing some of the things this job entails: Firstly the cab will carry upto 3 kids and a special minder must sit in the back with the kids. The minder carries a toffee hammer to break the windows in the event of an accident. Also, each time, before they set off the driver has to explain to the minder where the ignition key is - this is so in the event of the driver suffering a heart attack the minder will that these measures are probably a sop to the public rather than actually intended to be of any actual use. On 27 Feb 99, at 11:44, Micky wrote: > >I've seen special glass breaking hammers in some motoring shops just > because > >of this problem. A very worthwhile investment for such occasions. > My grandfather kept a small lump hammer in his BMW for just such an event... [ truncated by list-digester (was 14 lines)] > Micky > 101 in bits www: http://www.solwise.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Geoff Wilkin <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 09:16:22 -0000 Subject: Re: Mike Hammer(ite) Homepage - http://www.btinternet.com/~geoff.wilkin - (Site REVAMPED 18 Sept - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Geoff Wilkin <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 09:18:17 -0000 Subject: Re: Defender 110 CSW Homepage - http://www.btinternet.com/~geoff.wilkin - (Site REVAMPED 18 Sept - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Geoff Wilkin <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:00:53 -0000 Subject: Re: 2.25 diesel - non starting woes Homepage - http://www.btinternet.com/~geoff.wilkin - (Site REVAMPED 18 Sept - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Iain Tennant" <i.r.tennant@dundee.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:01:35 GMT Subject: Re: intro Gernot wrote: > I'll start with a question, I'm thinking of getting a defender, whats the > engine of choice, keeping in mind that I need a reasonably fast, powerful > and > durable engine. There isn't a great deal of choice really. Depends where in the world you are and if you're talking new or second-hand but for "reasonably fast" you're probably looking at a V8 or one of the intercooled turbo-diesels, i.e. a 200, 300 or TD5. If you're thinking about spanking-new, in the uk I think the TD5 is the only standard-fit engine on offer although there are almost certainly 300Tdi-engined jobs still on forecourts. The V8 is still I think (at least till recently anyway) an option from Special Vehicles. Various other engines have been fitted elsewhere, for example a BMW lump is fitted in S. Africa. Hope this is of help. Regards, Iain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: gwinston@cisco.com (Graham Winstone) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:16:15 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: intro Iain Tennant wrote: There isn't a great deal of choice really. Depends where in the world you are and if you're talking new or second-hand but for "reasonably fast" you're probably looking at a V8 or one of the intercooled turbo-diesels, i.e. a 200, 300 or TD5. I would never describe the V8 Defender as "reasonably fast". The V8 50th I used to have would be fine until it got to around 70mph. Around country lanes, very nice. Along the motorway, it was the worst 4.0 I have ever had. My old 4.0 Jeep was fantastic on the motorway and around country lanes. The only problem I had with the Jeep was off road the thing would cross axle too easily (perhaps I'm just too lazy to drive properly, but the 90 never had any off road problems). I'm already ducking for the abuse I know I am about to receive for mentioning the four letter word J word... - Graham - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Yves Marchi <yvmarchi@club-internet.fr> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 12:02:41 +0100 Subject: (pas d'objet) SUBSCRIBE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Orlando_Scott-Cowley@watsonwyatt.co.uk Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:36:57 +0000 Subject: Disco Lights. (Not, as in Boogie Woogie) How do Folks. I know this has been said before, I don't want to start a huge long thread so I've just got a quick question. Well, kinda quick. Last night driving round the M25 (in the rain) I decided my standard Disco headlights are, in a word naff. Full beam is O.K. but dipped just doesn't do the job. As far as I'm aware the bulbs are standard stock bulbs and I don't have any aux. lights. Here's the question. Any recommendations as to what to upgrade them to? i.e. watts etc... and where I can get them from. VMTIA. Orlando 93 Disco, slightly dim. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Anthony Cornell-Hewlett <Tony.Cornell-Hewlett@Bristol.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:45:12 +0000 (GMT) Subject: SCARE MONGERING 'PETROL TAX' Have you heard the latest in the press about the budget: Petrol to be increased by 0.24p per litre meaning that 84% of the price of petrol will be the tax element! God knows what price road tax will be increased by? regards TONY C-H 1987 V8 90 COUNTY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Baker, Stuart J" <bakersj@bp.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:45:57 -0000 Subject: Re: Instrument panel wiring Tom Just a thought but do you really need to do a complete re-wiring job? I remember that when I first looked behind the panel on mine, my reaction was "heck that's gonna need a complete rewire, what a mess". As I was doing a complete rebuild, it didn't bother me to much. However now that it's complete, I still have what looks like a bowl of spagbol, it's just that now, I know what all the wire do, and they are a nice clear colour. I would say, pull the panel out, make a comprehensive diagram of what wire goes where, remove them all, then see what you think. If the wires all clean up OK (so you can actually see what colour the are) and connections are in reasonable condition, then you might be save yourself a looming headache! Cheers Stuart SII Big and Yella - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Strang <john.strang@bbc.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:46:52 -0000 Subject: Neil's HSE Neil Wrote >>As I said in an earlier post, I saw the new 4.6 HSE and wanted one, budgets have deemed a 1996 model with 27000 miles on the clock. It is mint. So...it has to be done. << Congrats, a Very nice machine, >>I am a gadget man at heart sorry, << Ditto, but means more expense when (not if) they go wrong.. BTDT :-( >>I love the Series III to bits, and still love driving her, but the RR has the edge when you want to do a 400 mile haul and arrive the same day<< Agreed.. No contest.. >>so it is goodbye to the evercapable but sadly supported Explorer....I will never ever ever ever ever touch a Ford again. I don;t have any problem with their vehicles....it is the monkeys that service them. I hate being f*cked over by dealers....long story, but lets just say..if I had the money..one dealer here would be no more....kaboooooom!<< Again agreed, I have heard many tales of F**d dealers extracting the urine.. I considered the exploder for a while, then I woke up and the LSE won :-) (NB the nickname came from the states, where early models apparantly did!) >>I needed a new rear hub gasket at the same LR dealership and as it only cost 17p...they gave me it! Now that's service I like<< Some independent suppliers are also like that (but not many). >>1996 Range Rover 4.6 HSE - code named - 'Silver Machine' (after all I am a Hawkwind fan<< Hey, you're not the only one (I have a copy of them live on the Peel show circa 1973). twas rumoured they also recorded an album (called New Worlds Fair) with Michael Morecock (yep, the scifi author) under the name Deep Fix.. yeah, I'm not only a rover anorack, but a music one too, I'm also old enough to remember them).. Regards Strange John john.strang@bbc.co.uk 1994 LSE 1976 SWB series III 1998 Speed III - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Estibeiro" <petere@srv0.bio.ed.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:50:45 +0000 Subject: Re: 2.25 diesel - non starting woes > >Questions - a) What does the flat (ie not hex) screwy bit do on the bottom > >of the (b/head) fuel filter do? It drips slightly if I hand-prime the lift > >pump since the first morning - I don't think it leaked before. > The only screw fitting on the bottom of my fuel filter is a plastic drain > plug. Is this what you mean? If so it is for draining water out and should > be sealed using an O-ring. If this leaks badly it may cause the problems > you discribe, but I would have thought that it would have to leak quite > badly. Mine leaked from there for an annoying few weeks and caused all the non-starting and bleeding problems that you've been getting. As diesel leaks out air leaks in. If it drips when you hand prime the pump then its pretty bad. Get a new drain plug and o ring and the problem will probably go away Cheers Peter. Peter Estibeiro Membrane Biology Group Department of Biomedical Science University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH8 9XD tel: 44 131 6503731 fax: 44 131 6503711 email peter.estibeiro@ed.ac.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Strang <john.strang@bbc.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:53:24 -0000 Subject: Scare Mongering/Petrol tax Hi Guys.. Thats (Hopefully) the usual govt tactic, release predicted massive price rises, then no-one complains when you ONLY put it up by 6p.. I think (hope) the same will be true of the predicted rise in Road Fund duty.. Regards.. Strange John john.strang@bbc.co.uk 1994 LSE 1976 SWB series III 1998 Speed III - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Simon Minshall <simon@cinesite.co.uk> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 11:19:44 +0000 Subject: Rear Door/wheel I still need a new rear door for the 90. The best price I've been quoted so far to 80 pounds for a new pattern part. As before, I'm concerned about it's lifespan. Corrosion will soon weaken the bottom of the frame the the weight of the spare wheel will break it, though not necessarily in that order. Allan Smith suggested getting a wheel carrier. Adrian said to get it galvanised. I like these ideas the best. Getting a welder and making it out of sheet metal, I would probably enjoy but as I have no workspace to speak of, it's an impractical solution. Before I go and spend yet again, I'd like to dig a little deeper into the door flexing problem. There is a wheel carrier available from Mantec. It mounts onto the rear body at three points: two hinged joints near the rear door's hinges and a sliding joint attached to the door. The top hinge attaches to the steel rail on the body's mid section, the bottom hinge bolts to the bumper, and the sliding joint allows the door to open and close normally. With this setup, the vertical and the side-to-side momentum of the wheel will be transferred to the body/chassis by the wheel carrier but the front/back momentum will be absorbed by the door frame. So my question is, in practice what causes the door to flex? Is the most damage caused when the door/wheel is slammed shut, or caught open by the wind? Or does the damage occur from the forces of bumpy driving. It makes a difference in terms of the wheel carrier's usefullness. Such a carrier will be of no use if the door will be damaged from being used, but it will be a real solution if the door gets damaged from driving. Any thoughts? Simon -- Simon Minshall Imaging Systems Engineer 9 Carlisle Street Cinesite Digital Studios London W1V 5RG http://www.cinesite.co.uk tel:0171-973-4000 mailto:simon@cinesite.co.uk fax:0171-973-4040 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 15 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Steve Mace" <steve@solwise.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:33:04 -0000 Subject: Re: SCARE MONGERING 'PETROL TAX' I assume you mean 24p not 0.24p..... On 1 Mar 99, at 10:45, Anthony Cornell-Hewlett wrote: > Have you heard the latest in the press about the budget: > Petrol to be increased by 0.24p per litre meaning that 84% of the price of > petrol will be the tax element! God knows what price road tax will be > increased by? > regards > TONY C-H [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > TONY C-H > 1987 V8 90 COUNTY www: http://www.solwise.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Iain Tennant" <i.r.tennant@dundee.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:27:35 GMT Subject: Re: intro Graham wrote:.. > I would never describe the V8 Defender as "reasonably fast". The > V8 50th I used to have would be fine until it got to around 70mph. It achieves the uk speed limit then? In fact I had the 3.5 V8 in mind. No experience of the 4.0 so can't really comment on this except to say it wasn't exactly raved over when LROi did a comparative review a few months ago. Out of choice I'd personally go for the diesel but the clatter isn't to everyones taste. Regards, Iain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 17 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Baker, Stuart J" <bakersj@bp.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:32:51 -0000 Subject: Re: Instrument panel wiring Tom Just a thought but do you really need to do a complete re-wiring job? I remember that when I first looked behind the panel on mine, my reaction was "heck that's gonna need a complete rewire, what a mess". As I was doing a complete rebuild, it didn't bother me to much. However now that it's complete, I still have what looks like a bowl of spagbol, it's just that now, I know what all the wire do, and they are a nice clear colour. I would say, pull the panel out, make a comprehensive diagram of what wire goes where, remove them all, then see what you think. If the wires all clean up OK (so you can actually see what colour the are) and connections are in reasonable condition, then you might be save yourself a looming headache! Cheers Stuart SII Big and Yella - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 18 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: gwinston@cisco.com (Graham Winstone) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:39:27 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: intro Iain Tennant wrote: Graham wrote:.. > I would never describe the V8 Defender as "reasonably fast". The > V8 50th I used to have would be fine until it got to around 70mph. It achieves the uk speed limit then? On the flat. But to get it up hills, you had to kick the thing down. Or if there was a headwind, it could not maintain 70 in 4th, had to kick down, or drive in 3rd. In fact I had the 3.5 V8 in mind. No experience of the 4.0 so can't really comment on this except to say it wasn't exactly raved over when LROi did a comparative review a few months ago. Out of choice I agreed with every comment in the article. Mine had too many problems to list here though, and I doubt that anyone on the list is really interested. I'd personally go for the diesel but the clatter isn't to everyones taste. Now, the 90 TD5 does look an interesting beast. Am I a glutten for punishment or what ? Once bitten twice shy ? - Graham - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 19 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Simon Minshall <simon@cinesite.co.uk> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 11:54:38 +0000 Subject: Rear Door/wheel I still need a new rear door for the 90. The best price I've been quoted so far to 80 pounds for a new pattern part. As before, I'm concerned about it's lifespan. Corrosion will soon weaken the bottom of the frame the the weight of the spare wheel will break it, though not necessarily in that order. Allan Smith suggested getting a wheel carrier. Adrian said to get it galvanised. I like these ideas the best. Getting a welder and making it out of sheet metal, I would probably enjoy but as I have no workspace to speak of, it's an impractical solution. Before I go and spend yet again, I'd like to dig a little deeper into the door flexing problem. There is a wheel carrier available from Mantec. It mounts onto the rear body at three points: two hinged joints near the rear door's hinges and a sliding joint attached to the door. The top hinge attaches to the steel rail on the body's mid section, the bottom hinge bolts to the bumper, and the sliding joint allows the door to open and close normally. With this setup, the vertical and the side-to-side momentum of the wheel will be transferred to the body/chassis by the wheel carrier but the front/back momentum will be absorbed by the door frame. So my question is, in practice what causes the door to flex? Is the most damage caused when the door/wheel is slammed shut, or caught open by the wind? Or does the damage occur from the forces of bumpy driving. It makes a difference in terms of the wheel carrier's usefullness. Such a carrier will be of no use if the door will be damaged from being used, but it will be a real solution if the door gets damaged from driving. Any thoughts? Simon -- Simon Minshall Imaging Systems Engineer 9 Carlisle Street Cinesite Digital Studios London W1V 5RG http://www.cinesite.co.uk tel:0171-973-4000 mailto:simon@cinesite.co.uk fax:0171-973-4040 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Iain Tennant" <i.r.tennant@dundee.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:26:20 GMT Subject: Re: intro > list here though, and I doubt that anyone on the list is really interested. Not true. In my experience members of this list are interested in all matters LR. You never know, constructive critical comment may even result in improvements. (You ARE listening in aren't you LR?) > Now, the 90 TD5 does look an interesting beast. Am I a glutten for > punishment or what ? Once bitten twice shy ? If you've driven a 200 or 300 Defender I don't think you'd be disappointed. Had a drive in a TD5 90 a couple weeks ago and there seemed very little difference to the 300 apart from a bit more power. Only time will tell as to reliability or durability. Regards, Iain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 13:34:15 +0100
Subject: Re: Mike Hammer(ite)
We're talking black gloss enamel hammerite
Adrian Redmond
CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond)
Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark
telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66
telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64
telefacsimile / data +45 86 57 24 46
mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64
mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 54 22 66
mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66
e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk
Visit the "Native Experience" website at
http://www.channel6.dk/native
Contact the "Native Experience" film unit in Alaska
telephone +1 (907) 230 0359
e-mail channel6@alaska.net
Visit our homepages! www.channel6.dk
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 22 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 13:36:31 +0100
Subject: D90/110 engine choice (was: intro)
The new TD5 (if my info is right) is an electronic/computer controlled
jobbie - putting an end to the Sunday afternoon tweaking of us
enthusiasts - that's why i will buy a 110 CSW with the 300 Tdi if I go
that route.
Adrian Redmond
http://www.channel6.dk/native
[Attachment removed, was 1 lines.]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 23 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: "Iain Tennant" <i.r.tennant@dundee.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:37:36 GMT Subject: Re: Freelander (LANDROVER SPIRIT OF ADVENTURE) In response to Tom Murkin's comments:.... > A friend of mine had a lucky escape a few years back when the car he was > driving ended up in a ditch with the water half way up the windows. The Graham wrote:... > I've seen special glass breaking hammers in some motoring shops just because > of this problem. A very worthwhile investment for such occasions. Yes, a good idea, in fact we have one fitted in the front beside the extinguisher. Got it cheap several years ago but any wee hammer will do so no need to fork out on a special. As for usefulness... In fact the easiest way to get out of most cars if the doors are jammed (and you're mobile) is to push out the front screen with your feet, been there... done it! Most likely use is to get into a crashed car if you come across an accident where the doors are either locked or jammed. The custom made things also have a recessed blade for cutting seat belts. Regards, Iain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 24 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: gwinston@cisco.com (Graham Winstone) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:39:50 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: D90/110 engine choice (was: intro) Adrian Redmond wrote: The new TD5 (if my info is right) is an electronic/computer controlled jobbie - putting an end to the Sunday afternoon tweaking of us enthusiasts - that's why i will buy a 110 CSW with the 300 Tdi if I go that route. I don't know. How long before someone makes a gadget to allow you to connect your PC to your car to have a play tweaking it without getting your hands dirty. Food for thought. - Graham - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 25 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Iain Tennant" <i.r.tennant@dundee.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:56:13 GMT Subject: Re: D90/110 engine choice (was: intro) Adrian wrote:.. > The new TD5 (if my info is right) is an electronic/computer controlled > jobbie - putting an end to the Sunday afternoon tweaking of us > enthusiasts - that's why i will buy a 110 CSW with the 300 Tdi if I go > that route. Is the TD5 engine management system any more complex than that of the 300? Surely both rely mainly on a single ECU and if this is the case (I don't know) then what's the problem with a new Defender over the old. All the other electronic gizmos (ABS etc) are optional. Regards, Iain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 15:10:49 +0100
Subject: Re: D90/110 engine choice (was: intro)
AFAIK the 300TDi is almost completelty "manual" the only electronics of
which i am aware is the EGR or whatever it's called. But please correct
me if I am wrong...
Adrian Redmond
http://www.channel6.dk/native
[Attachment removed, was 1 lines.]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 27 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: Geoff Wilkin <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 14:23:07 -0000 Subject: Oil Hi Chaps... Its oil change time for me... and I notice, that like Old mother Hubbards cupboard... my nice 25 Litre drum of CCMC D5 SHPD oil is near empty. Land Rover SHPD (Super High Performance Diesel) id 19 UKP + VAT per 5 litres... OUCH :-(( I was using Unipart GUL 8035 SHPD oil, and so far so good. Except that dont make it any more and the replacement isnt CCMC D5 spec. So... What are all you Diesel Demons out there using?... I was considering Castrol Turbomax, but thats Not CCMC D5, but does say its SHPD. The only CCMC D5 oil I can find is Tetrosil aka Comma, and I am not too happy about letting that loose in my 35k (miles) 200 tdi. I would prefer a lower spec of a quality oil like Castrol... At least I know that I wouldnt be too far from wrong. What do you 200 / 300 Tdi chaps do?... replies on a small postcard, or alternatively on an Email!.. TIA Best Regards Geoff Wilkin This note is copyright of Geoff Wilkin and should not be published elsewhere in whole or part without the strict agreement of the author. EMail geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com Homepage - http://www.btinternet.com/~geoff.wilkin - (Site REVAMPED 18 Sept '97) All views expressed are my own and are no-one elses! (or so I am told). '84 110 CSW - Green & Clean '73 Lightweight V6 - All in bits - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andrew Baker <Andrew_Baker@mitel.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 14:28:06 -0000 Subject: RE: Oil > From: Geoff Wilkin[SMTP:geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com] > So... What are all you Diesel Demons out there using?... > I was considering Castrol Turbomax, but thats Not CCMC D5, but does > say its > SHPD. Whatever is on offer at the local accessories place. My 109 changes it's own oil so I've never bothered with the expensive stuff. Andrew B 109 2.25D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Geoff Wilkin <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 14:39:32 -0000 Subject: Re: Cable markings . I use 7 core trailer cable, and .>re-run this from the bulkhead just beside the heater coil, all the way .>through the chassis, and up into the right hand light compartment. .>Similar cables run from the RH compartment to the LH and from the RH .>compartment to the trailer socket. All cables are marked to indicate .>where they go(come from) like - TO FRONT / TO TRAILER SOCKET / TO RH .>LIGHTS. Each wire is marked with its function. I use insulated crimp .>connectors (size BLUE) as these fit quite wel into LR torpedo connectors .>for doubling up. Hmmm good Idea.. I will follow suit when I rewire the LtWt. I was going to plug it at the rear tub, so I could get the tub off easily without messing about t with the wiring. I wont go thru the chassis, I had a load of probs when I did my 110 rear X member. They are now all soldered and sealed in self amalgamating tape, been OK for 3 years. I will still solder on the crimped terminals. Crimping is best if you have the proper crimpers, ie you get a really tight crimp where water cant get in etc. So I crimp and solder over to maintain the contact, then it wont corrode inside the crimp. Then I protect it with SA tape. That usually sorts it. Best Regards Geoff Wilkin This note is copyright of Geoff Wilkin and should not be published elsewhere in whole or part without the strict agreement of the author. EMail geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com Homepage - http://www.btinternet.com/~geoff.wilkin - (Site REVAMPED 18 Sept '97) All views expressed are my own and are no-one elses! (or so I am told). '84 110 CSW - Green & Clean '73 Lightweight V6 - All in bits - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 14:48:30 +0000 Subject: RE: Oil Whatever is on offer at the local accessories place. My 109 >changes it's own oil so I've never bothered with the expensive stuff. So does my 88,but I occasionally give it a birthday.Mainly I use B&Q 20-50,unless I can bestir myself to go and get Miller's 20-50. OTOH,Andrew he *has* got one of those shiny Tdi thingys.So perhaps he's a shade more picky than us agricultural types....:-) Cheers Mike Rooth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 31 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Ian Stuart <ian.stuart@ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 15:58:17 +0000
Subject: Re: hi-list goes up, not down
Jan Schokker wrote:
> Going up is no problem, but lowering the load is possible only when I push
> the lower half of the sliding part down bij hand. If I don't do this the
> pegs don't engage in their holes and the handle blocks.
Do they no slide out, or not slide in
(Shades of Viagra again..)
> I have tried to cure this by filing the edges of the holes in the bar, and
> smoothing the sides of the bar with sanding paper, but still no go.
> My parts dealer ordered the jack for me in the UK, but doesn't know much
> about it.
Hmm..
> This is not a very safe way to operate the jack.
And then some ;)
> Sounds familiar? Will it improve over time? If I have to help it going down
> when used vertically, how can I ever use the jack horizontally?
Have you tried putting some light oil on the mechanism?
If it runs dry, it does stick.
--
--==**==--
Ian Stuart - University computing services.
Opinions are funny things:
Mine are mine and mine alone
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 32 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: Geoff Wilkin <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:04:08 -0000 Subject: Funny things on bumpers Further to our rantings on the blue poles etc... I now see the ones everyone is talking about, a few more have gone up in the last week or so. However... I am curious as to these little black things on the front of busses. Its a black plastic object about 4" x 1" by about 2/3" high. They are always mounted vertically on the bumpers at the front and only on the front. Are these the sensor detectors for changing the traffic lights in Bus Lanes?.. I appreciate that councils are now imposing a "Time Tax" on us motorists to "encourage" us to use the park and rideschemes. ie putting Bus and cycle lanes everywhere and producing huge queues of cars (Very environmentally friendly eh?) Or are they for dropping the bollards into restricted areas, as I have also seen one on a Taxi (Cab - not hire car) I shall now look to see if they are on Fire engines, Police cars and Ambulances... my curiosity is getting the better of me! Anyone throw some light on this Best Regards Geoff Wilkin This note is copyright of Geoff Wilkin and should not be published elsewhere in whole or part without the strict agreement of the author. EMail geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com Homepage - http://www.btinternet.com/~geoff.wilkin - (Site REVAMPED 18 Sept '97) All views expressed are my own and are no-one elses! (or so I am told). '84 110 CSW - Green & Clean '73 Lightweight V6 - All in bits - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 33 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andrew Baker <Andrew_Baker@mitel.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:03:37 -0000 Subject: I'm really getting fed up How do I configure Exchange to use something other than ">" to indicate reply lines? I could cut and paste replies to a new msg and use my own choice of char but that defeats the idea of a reply option. Andrew B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Dowson" <Peter.Dowson@softwareag.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:21:21 -0000 Subject: Re: Funny things on bumpers Geoff Wilkin wrote :- -> -> snip -> ->However... I am curious as to these little black things on the front of ->busses. ->Its a black plastic object about 4" x 1" by about 2/3" high. They are ->always mounted vertically on the bumpers at the front and only on the front. -> Are these the sensor detectors for changing the traffic lights in Bus ->Lanes?.. -> -> snip I know that in some areas buses are carrying two cameras which record the goings on in bus lanes (reviewed later by the police). Two cameras so that one high up can see what is going on and one lower down to read the registration plate. Maybe a bit Big Brotherish but I have no time for those who blatantly break laws. Peter Dowson S1 80" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 35 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: gwinston@cisco.com (Graham Winstone) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:25:02 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: I'm really getting fed up Andrew Baker wrote: How do I configure Exchange to use something other than ">" to indicate reply lines? I could cut and paste replies to a new msg and use my own choice of char but that defeats the idea of a reply option. As I'm in an expansive mood today, wipe your hard drive, install Linux, then I'll be able to help with your questions :-) - Graham - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 36 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Gardiner <101_nut@shedcity.demon.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:15:06 +0000 Subject: electric windowss In message <bulk.13551.19990227000626@Land-Rover.Team.Net>, owner-uk- lro-digest@playground.sun.com writes >He will now >not even consider a car with electric windows, and can't understand what is >so difficult about turning a handle. '76 Range Rover, choke full out, feel like opening windows, swear, curse, blaspheme as knuckles wrap themselves around that bloody choke knob on one side and the door handle on the other! 'leccy windows may have their moments! -- Andy Gardiner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andrew Baker <Andrew_Baker@mitel.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:51:32 -0000 Subject: RE: I'm really getting fed up Actually I've been going to install linux for quite some time now but have never quite got round to it. Andrew - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:54:10 +0000 Subject: Re: Funny things on bumpers >Maybe a bit Big Brotherish but I have no time for those who blatantly break >laws. Well,neither have I but there are limits.And I am beginning to be of the opinion that its time Plod earned his own not inconsiderable salary,as well as doing his own dirty work. Whilst I can (just) accept surveillance cameras (out in the open,easily seen,and therefore a deterrent) I most certainly *dont* accept the ones on traffic lights which are virtually hidden,therefore *dont* act as a deterrent,but as some sort of sneaky entrapment device.OK,so I dont run red lights either,but you'd get fewer people doing it if the cameras were in full view.Or isnt the idea to prevent lawbreaking at all,but some other agenda we arent privy to? Cheers Mike Rooth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 39 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Geoff Wilkin <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:00:02 -0000 Subject: Re: Mike Hammer(ite) Homepage - http://www.btinternet.com/~geoff.wilkin - (Site REVAMPED 18 Sept - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 40 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:00:17 +0000 Subject: Re: electric windowss >'leccy windows may have their moments! Ah,windows 76.Better in the next issue,but then they wouldnt shut.... Cheers Mike Rooth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 41 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Geoff Wilkin <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:17:29 -0000 Subject: Re: Funny things on bumpers .>I know that in some areas buses are carrying two cameras which record the .>goings on in bus lanes (reviewed later by the police). Two cameras so that .>one high up can see what is going on and one lower down to read the .>registration plate. .>Maybe a bit Big Brotherish but I have no time for those who blatantly break .>laws. Hmm I agree, I have heard of these cameras, I have no problem with that, but this appears to be a self contained unit, havent seen any wiring, but it could be fed from the rear. They have no apertures at all, and are definately not cameras. They are completely sealed to the front.I wondered if they are simmilar to the devices used in shops to prevent good leaving ie anti shoplifting devices. I was thinking they may use a simmilar technology. Still Baffled .... Best Regards Geoff Wilkin This note is copyright of Geoff Wilkin and should not be published elsewhere in whole or part without the strict agreement of the author. EMail geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com Homepage - http://www.btinternet.com/~geoff.wilkin - (Site REVAMPED 18 Sept '97) All views expressed are my own and are no-one elses! (or so I am told). '84 110 CSW - Green & Clean '73 Lightweight V6 - All in bits - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 42 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Geoff Wilkin <geoff.wilkin@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:19:42 -0000 Subject: Re: Oil Homepage - http://www.btinternet.com/~geoff.wilkin - (Site REVAMPED 18 Sept - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 43 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 20:34:18 +0100
Subject: Cable crimpings (was: Cable markings)
Soldering cables to crimp connectors is a good idea - but be sure to
solder to the connector and not (as some Japanese electronics
manufacturers do it) just tin the cable and crimp it. As the solder
works loose with age, the joint loosens.
Tinning first is essential for a good joint. The best recipe is to use
uninsulated crimp connectors, so that you can tin the wire, the stick it
into a hot uncrimped connector - then crimp it, then a dab of solder
again (to avoid japanese woes) - then insulate with 2 layers of heat
shrink sleeving. Such a joint will last forever.
Adrian Redmond
http://www.channel6.dk/native
[Attachment removed, was 1 lines.]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 44 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: "George Corner" <George@gacorner.force9.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:45:35 -0000 Subject: Re: Disco Lights. (Not, as in Boogie Woogie) Uprating the bulbs on their own is not the answer. The geometry of the light units are just not that good. Geo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 45 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Micky" <micky@big101.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 20:54:11 -0000 Subject: Re: Funny things on bumpers >Hmm I agree, I have heard of these cameras, I have no problem with that, but >this appears to be a self contained unit, havent seen any wiring, but it >could be fed from the rear. >They have no apertures at all, and are definately not cameras. They are >completely sealed to the front.I wondered if they are simmilar to the >devices used in shops to prevent good leaving ie anti shoplifting devices. I >was thinking they may use a simmilar technology. >Still Baffled .... >They have no apertures at all, and are definately not cameras. They are >completely sealed to the front.I wondered if they are simmilar to the Are you sure they are not those squirty things for washing windscreens and lights and stuff? Just a thought... Cheers Micky 101 in bits - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 46 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Micky" <micky@big101.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 21:14:23 -0000 Subject: Hawkwind, was: Neil's HSE >Neil >>>1996 Range Rover 4.6 HSE - code named - 'Silver Machine' (after all I am a >Hawkwind fan<< > Hey, you're not the only one (I have a copy of them live on the Peel >show > circa 1973). twas rumoured they also recorded an album (called New >Worlds > Fair) with Michael Morecock (yep, the scifi author) under the name >Deep Fix.. [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] >old enough > to remember them).. Bloomin' hippies.... :-) Mind, Hawkwind wasn't all bad - they did give the rock world Lemmy... Cheers Micky 101 in bits - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 47 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Micky" <micky@big101.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 21:06:32 -0000 Subject: Re: Funny things on bumpers >>Maybe a bit Big Brotherish but I have no time for those who blatantly break >>laws. Must admit,l I have absolutely no time for those who jump lights or speed excessively. Did you know that you can get an on the spot fine in Germany for having a part of the vehicle cross the line at lights, even if it's only 6 inches. Might be an urban myth... >Well,neither have I but there are limits.And I am beginning to be >of the opinion that its time Plod earned his own not inconsiderable >salary,as well as doing his own dirty work. But these cameras (when there's any film in the thing) are big money earners. A6 near Stockport - there is a camera just after the road goes from 60mph to 30mph - apparently it's the most profitable in the country... >Whilst I can (just) accept surveillance cameras (out in the open,easily >seen,and therefore a deterrent) Not for that Stephen Lawrence statue. (Ooh er, little bit of politics :-) I most certainly *dont* accept the ones >on traffic lights which are virtually hidden,therefore *dont* act as a >deterrent,but as some sort of sneaky entrapment device.OK,so I dont run >red lights either,but you'd get fewer people doing it if the cameras >were in full view.Or isnt the idea to prevent lawbreaking at all,but >some other agenda we arent privy to? I think the idea is that once you've been done a few times, it's more quids in the Police coffers, and you're less likely to commit the same offence again. I have no objection to buses with cameras. When you're sitting in a queue of traffic and some youth in an XR2 boom box with wheels comes screaming up the bus lane, it kinda gets on my tits. Okay, in the great scheme of motoring offences it's probably not important, but if everyone does it, there's no point having the bus lane. Anyway, back to the little boxes on buses - couldn't they be transmitters for those new fangled bus stops (whoa! I'm not 25 for a month and already I'm starting to sound like an old fogey) which tell you when the next bus will arrive? Was stood at one of those stops, said next bus in 5 minutes, last bus of the night. Then said 4, 3, 2, 1 minutes. Waited with anticipation for a few more minutes. Then the screen went blank and the lights went out on the shelter. Bummer... Cheers Micky 101 in bits - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 48 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Clarke"<Richard.Clarke@nre.vic.gov.au> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 08:17:22 +1000 Subject: Re: high lift (not) going down spray some silicone spray on the pins to lubricate them you can use RP7/WD40 or alike but it is messy and will attract the dirt for next time the pins can sometimes bend, which will stop them retracting properly - but I think you said your jack was new so this should'nt be the case - maybe there is too much paint on the pins stopping them sliding properly?, work them in and out a few times, or sand the paint off if this is the case my jack is 15 years old, and I find a sqirt of silicone every now and then keeps it working richard c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 49 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[spamkill: hostnames start w/letter input: %s] Message-ID: <000c01be643a$b35f4a80$b64b883e@2286> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 50 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: AVAC11@aol.com Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 18:29:54 EST Subject: Re: intro In a message dated 01/03/99 11:39:45 GMT Normalzeit, gwinston@cisco.com writes: > It achieves the uk speed limit then? > On the flat. But to get it up hills, you had to kick the thing down. > Or if there was a headwind, it could not maintain 70 in 4th, had to > kick down, or drive in 3rd. > In fact I had the 3.5 V8 in mind. No experience of the 4.0 so can't > really comment on this except to say it wasn't exactly raved over > when LROi did a comparative review a few months ago. Out of choice [ truncated by list-digester (was 19 lines)] > Now, the 90 TD5 does look an interesting beast. Am I a glutten for > punishment or what ? Once bitten twice shy ? I could aceive the 70 with the 2 and a quarter, though I didn't find it feeling good. Haven't read that article obviously but the V8 should have some grunt, whats wrong with it again, some lo compression watered down version? What engine does the TD5 have then? I was indeed thinking of something spanking new as it has to go through the books. The LR will be bought in Germany, I know they don't officially export them there but you can get them in all kinda bodys, including the wierd six seater pick up. Gernot - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 51 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: AVAC11@aol.com Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 18:29:55 EST Subject: Re: Rear Door/wheel In a message dated 01/03/99 11:15:46 GMT Normalzeit, simon@cinesite.co.uk writes: > So my question is, in practice what causes the door to flex? Is the most > damage caused when the door/wheel is slammed shut, or caught open by the > wind? Or does the damage occur from the forces of bumpy driving. It > makes a difference in terms of the wheel carrier's usefullness. Such a > carrier will be of no use if the door will be damaged from being used, > but it will be a real solution if the door gets damaged from driving. I think its the weight of the whel itself that causes flexing, I'm only talking from the SIII's but the frame is too weak to keep up with it in combination with slighlty underdimensioned hinges. Gernot - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 52 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: AVAC11@aol.com Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:01:54 EST Subject: Re: Funny things on bumpers In a message dated 01/03/99 21:17:52 GMT Normalzeit, micky@big101.freeserve.co.uk writes: > Must admit,l I have absolutely no time for those who jump lights or speed > excessively. Did you know that you can get an on the spot fine in Germany > for having a part of the vehicle cross the line at lights, even if it's only > 6 inches. Might be an urban myth... > excessively. Did you know that you can get an on the spot fine in Germany Is urban myth. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 53 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Matthew Reeve & Mel Mauger" <blatchwood@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 20:45:09 -0000 Subject: Re: LATIN? (no LR content) >Know that I'm not the only reactionary old fart on this list, and >assuming that there must be some others whose Latin grammar is better >than mine - can anyone translate the following... >"Pic vivere et Deum et patrium deligere" >Adrian Redmond No such word as "pic", could possibly be "dic", but still not grammatically correct. For "patrium" try "patriam", then it is something like " Tell (them) to live and choose God and country." However, one letter different in "deligere" would change it from "choose" to "love". Matthew UK, nr Heathrow 1979 2-dr Range Rover 300Tdi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 54 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Allan Smith <smitha@candw.lc> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 22:14:14 -0500 Subject: Re: Oil At 14:23 01/03/99 +0000, Geoff wrote: >Hi Chaps... >Its oil change time for me... and I notice, that like Old mother Hubbards >cupboard... my nice 25 Litre drum of CCMC D5 SHPD oil is near empty. >What do you 200 / 300 Tdi chaps do?... replies on a small postcard, or >alternatively on an Email!.. >TIA Oh boy, has this one ever gone around to no good conclusion. We agonize. We discuss it at length on the ZA list, with some really informed contributions from them. We carry SHPD oil illegally in our luggage. We try to get our local dealers to help: Shell to import Myrina - Texaco their Ursa Super TD etc, to no avail; we hear that Monolec is the oil of choice of the Slavins (who supplied my 300) for their expedition vehicles and try to import that; we hear so much conflicting information on this that a definitive piece would be really welcome. Allan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 55 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Allan Smith <smitha@candw.lc> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 22:20:25 -0500 Subject: RE: Oil BTW - the call was for a turbo spec. It is not helpfull to tell someone with a Tdi that they can get away with the stuff your 2.25s are happy with. Lucky you. Allan. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 56 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: gwinston@cisco.com (Graham Winstone) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 08:02:51 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: intro AVAC11@aol.com wrote: I could aceive the 70 with the 2 and a quarter, though I didn't find it feeling good. Haven't read that article obviously but the V8 should have some grunt, whats wrong with it again, some lo compression watered down version? What engine does the TD5 have then? I was indeed thinking of something spanking new as it has to go through the books. The LR will be bought in Germany, I know they don't officially export them there but you can get them in all kinda bodys, including the wierd six seater pick up. The engine was supposed to be 190bhp, but I don't believe that. The real problem is that the thing is completly over geared. Move the auto lever to '3', and the thing would be acceptable, move it to 'D' and you would slow down and have to stamp on the pedal to get the thing to kick down again. With all this going on, it barely managed to get 120 miles on each tank of petrol which was a real bummer. I was going to add here the 'just my $0.02 worth' here, but then though what is the european version of this with the euro now. Being completely ignorant of this, are there only whole euro's, or is there a pennies variant of the currency as well ? Is 'just my E0.02 worth' acceptable ? - Graham - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 57 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST
Input: messages 56 lines 2640 [forwarded 170 whitespace 0]
Output: lines 1619 [content 1326 forwarded 147 (cut 23) whitespace 0]
UK/IE Land Rover Owner Additional Information:
In addition so subscribing and unsubscribing, the Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQ) file and the last month of daily digests may be retrieved
(by mail) from majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net
Useful commands for this are 'index uk-lro-digest' which returns a list of
files available, as well as 'get lro-digest <filename>', etc.
UK/EIRE World Wide Web Sites start at
http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/pages.html
(shadow) http://www2.Land-Rover.Team.Net/pages.html
If Major Domo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have
understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net
-B
[ First | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990302 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]