[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
| msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
| 1 | "Nick Bennett" [bennett_ | 19 | Repair manuals |
| 2 | Mick Forster [cmtmgf@mai | 27 | Re: Repair manuals |
| 3 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 26 | Re[2]: Xfer case mods |
| 4 | John Cranfield [john.cra | 25 | Re: Ball Joints |
| 5 | "Tackley, John" [jtackle | 23 | RE: ball joint |
| 6 | John Cranfield [john.cra | 13 | Re: King Kong |
| 7 | Paul Oxley [paul@adventu | 7 | Re: Body panel compatibility |
| 8 | "Andy Grafton" [andyg@sh | 17 | Re: King Kong |
| 9 | "Andy Grafton" [andyg@sh | 58 | Re: Re[2]: Xfer case mods |
| 10 | "Braman Wing" [bcw6@hotm | 35 | Re: Xfer case mods |
| 11 | Paul Oxley [paul@adventu | 24 | Re: Xfer case mods |
| 12 | "Nick Bennett" [bennett_ | 18 | Roof top tents |
| 13 | "Wolfe, Charles" [CWolfe | 12 | RE: Roof top tents |
| 14 | "Wolfe, Charles" [CWolfe | 4 | [not specified] |
| 15 | TeriAnn Wakeman [twakema | 40 | Re: Land Rovers are y2k compliant |
| 16 | David Scheidt [david@inf | 17 | Re: Re[2]: Xfer case mods |
| 17 | John Cranfield [john.cra | 31 | Re: Roof top tents |
| 18 | "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" | 32 | Lists |
| 19 | "Faure, Marin" [Marin.Fa | 32 | Re: Xfer case mods |
| 20 | "Peter Hope" [phope@hawa | 20 | Re: oxen (was ball joint) |
| 21 | "Martin Bagshaw" [mbags@ | 23 | Landrovers for sale by CND GOV ! |
| 22 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 22 | Re[5]: Diff. drain plug removal |
| 23 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 17 | Re[2]: Xfer case mods |
| 24 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 31 | Re[2]: Xfer case mods |
| 25 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 21 | Re[2]: Window seals |
| 26 | Paul Oxley [paul@adventu | 34 | Re: Xfer case mods |
| 27 | Paul Oxley [paul@adventu | 17 | Re: oxen (was ball joint) |
| 28 | "Faure, Marin" [Marin.Fa | 69 | Re: Xfer case mods |
| 29 | Paul Quin [Paul_Quin@pml | 48 | RE: Land Rovers are y2k compliant |
| 30 | "Peter Hope" [phope@hawa | 19 | Rovers and Tea (a sighting of sorts) |
| 31 | "Russell G. Dushin" [rgd | 26 | Re: oxen (was ball joint) |
| 32 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 22 | Re: Body panel compatibility |
| 33 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 7 | [not specified] |
| 34 | dbobeck@ushmm.org | 7 | [not specified] |
| 35 | "Kevin Campbell" [KCampb | 28 | Compression readings |
| 36 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 29 | Re: Compression readings |
| 37 | "Kevin Campbell" [KCampb | 18 | RE: Compression readings |
| 38 | "Christian Szpilfogel" [ | 48 | re:V8 carbs |
| 39 | Alan_Richer@motorcity2.l | 15 | RE: Compression readings |
| 40 | Zaxcoinc@aol.com | 21 | Re: oxen (was ball joint) |
| 41 | Todd Schlemmer [nullman@ | 30 | Re: head injuries (was oxen) (was ball joint) |
| 42 | "Frank Elson" [frankelso | 28 | Re: oxen (was ball joint) |
| 43 | "James G.Wolf" [elvenwoo | 13 | e-mail address change |
| 44 | Zaxcoinc@aol.com | 18 | Re: oxen (was ball joint) |
| 45 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 16 | Re: Anti-seize |
| 46 | "Peter Hope" [phope@hawa | 17 | Re: oxen (was ball joint) |
| 47 | SFmms@aol.com | 32 | Re: Bumper Dumper camping accessory |
| 48 | Paul Oxley [paul@adventu | 23 | Re: Window seals |
| 49 | Allan Smith [smitha@cand | 22 | Re: Bumper Dumper camping accessory |
| 50 | "Bill Fishel" [bfishel@c | 28 | re: head injuries and rover owners |
| 51 | "Bill Fishel" [bfishel@c | 19 | re: mods to bumper dumper |
| 52 | Paul Oxley [paul@adventu | 20 | Re: head injuries and rover owners |
| 53 | "Sona" [franz76@compuser | 26 | HOT FOR 1999 !!! |
| 54 | Dale Smith [smithd@bunt. | 16 | Virtual bartender... |
| Majordomo | About the digest |
From: "Nick Bennett" <bennett_nick@hotmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 03:52:29 PST Subject: Repair manuals Next question, In LROi and LRW the genuine repair manuals seem to be 2 parts for the series 11 (engine and then rest of vehicle) but there only seems to be one manual for the series 111. Is this correct or do I have a problem reading? I am going to need this/these plus the parts catalogue, anything else anyone would recommend? My budget is by no means endless but I know the right sources of information could save me hours during the rebuild. Thanks again Nick - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mick Forster <cmtmgf@mail.soc.staffs.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:37:42 +0000 Subject: Re: Repair manuals Nick Bennett wrote: > Next question, > In LROi and LRW the genuine repair manuals seem to be 2 parts for the > series 11 (engine and then rest of vehicle) but there only seems to be > one manual for the series 111. Is this correct Yes. The Series III manual is printed 'landscape' as opposed to 'portrait' and the images are smaller. Some of the details in the Series II manual are missing from the Series III (cut-away diagrams of engines and gearbox and pictures of how the drive is conveyed through the gearbox in different gears) You really need both! plus the Haynes manual plus all the other Rover 'How-to' booklets plus 30 years experience etc. Or you could just ask the list ........... Mick Forster 1972 109" Series III Safari 2.25 petrol 1962 88" Series IIa 2.25 petrol http://gawain.soc.staffs.ac.uk/~mick/landpics.html http://members.aol.com/IssyJames/LRlinks/LRlinks.htm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Thu, 21 Jan 99 15:54:50 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: Xfer case mods dbobeck@ushmm.org wrote: > If I remember correctly the fix was to make the yellow lever pop up when the > red lever was in the neutral position, as it is not until you engage low range >Umm, Dave, that's how it works in any case... no, it doesn't pop up until it hits lo range. if I am wrong about this than no mods would be necessary to make it come out of 4 hi on the move. just pop the red lever back into neutral. the problem with shifting on the move into lo-range is in the engagement of two straight cut non synchro gear wheels. It *can* be done with some skillful double clutching. I have only heard of this but not tried it. Apparently it is required sometimes in desert travel. right? I'll check this out tonight later dave - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:06:41 -0400 Subject: Re: Ball Joints Quite right, What happens is that the taper is momentarily distorted which breaks the lock. As most of us have found at times this lock of the two tapered parts is unbelievably strong but a distortion will free it. John and Muddy Faye and Peter Ogilvie wrote: > I think I got the picture but just want to be sure. You are advocating > hitting the arm side ways against a backing hammer. Not striking down or > up to drive the ball joint out. Just seems a bit odd but if it works, what > the hey!!! > Aloha Peter > At 09:14 AM 1/21/99 -0400, you wrote: > >All you say is true Mitch but in this situation you would have the [ truncated by list-digester (was 24 lines)] > > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 11 lines)] > >> mushroom after repeated blows and the tip will still have an edge. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tackley, John" <jtackley.dit@state.va.us> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:10:26 -0500 Subject: RE: ball joint >I don't know what we are defining as a "universal" ball joint tool but if what you are talking about looks like a pickle fork on steriods you've got the right animal. but you should be able to buy one for less than 65 pounds. I think they are cheaper than that at Snap-On (and they are outrageous). I look for tools that will do the job a few times even if I wouldn't hang them above the mantle. >Bill Lawrence Albq, NM At Northern Tools and Equipment (http://www.northerntools.com) one can obtain a 'pickle fork' that inserts into your standard air [spamkill: @[0-9][0-9]* input: %s] hammer...@15$US...sure 'beats' the fork/hammer method. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:19:55 -0400 Subject: Re: King Kong I f one of my co workers did that to me I'd go ape. John and Muddy Andy Grafton wrote: > Sorry about the funny name ~ my co-workers idea of a joke. > Andy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:33:44 +0200 Subject: Re: Body panel compatibility Nick Bennett wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Andy Grafton" <andyg@sherco.co.za> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:33:36 +0200 Subject: Re: King Kong > I f one of my co workers did that to me I'd go ape. Boom Boom as Basil Brush would say... Well it made me smile! Have a good weekend, John. All the best, Andy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Andy Grafton" <andyg@sherco.co.za> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:38:22 +0200 Subject: Re: Re[2]: Xfer case mods > shifting on the move into lo-range is in the engagement of two straight cut non # synchro gear wheels. It *can* be done with some skillful double clutching. I > have only heard of this but not tried it. Apparently it is required sometimes # in desert travel. Dave you are correct in that (well on our SIII) the lever must go all the way into low to pop up the yellow knob. Warning to those not aware : the procedure below is dangerous to your transfer gearbox. Hi-Low shifting is as you say possible on the move, even at considerable speeds (like 20kph), but you have to get it right or you lose teeth off the low range selection gear... Regular double clutching isn't sufficient to speed the 'box up enough to match the gear speeds so what you do is put the transfer lever into neutral, select the appropriate gear on the main gearlever, rev the engine to match engine speed to ground speed and gently move the transfer lever into low. You should dip the clutch to disconnect the engine from the gearbox just as you begin to move the transfer lever for safety's sake, as you'll do a lot more damage to the transfer 'box if you get the speeds wrong with the engine doing 3,000rpm *and* driving the gearbox. When you let the clutch back in make sure that the engine is still revved way up or you'll go through the windscreen. Use more revs rather than less. The above applies to any of the conventional transfer cases; I'm not sure quite how it would affect the epicyclic gears in the chain driven 'box as found on Rangies. In the real world I have only ever gone from 1st high to 1st low in this way, only in a SIII, and only then as a last ditch attempt to preserve momentum on sand when I absolutely couldn't afford to become stationary. I think changing to 2nd and then doing the transfer thing (as would be more appropriate) would take too long in that situation. No this is definitely not advised, but after a couple of goes I managed it without nasty gear noises. Yes all the teeth were still left on the gears! Out of interest I played gently with the same thing on the road, where the car would roll along at a constant speed. I find it easier with Rangie's (LT95) hi-low selection lever than I do with the SIII as it is smoother and you can feel if it's not right long before you engage. Maybe the spiral cut gears have something to do with it? All the best, Andy This comes with the usual disclaimers. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Braman Wing" <bcw6@hotmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 06:09:43 PST Subject: Re: Xfer case mods Bill Adams wrote: ">From this we must assume that: A. You live on a street where no traffic exists, nullifying the need to stop at the end of the driveway. B. You do not recieve newspapers or mail, again negating any need to stop at the end of the driveway. C. You do not like to bend at the waist and move a lever, or at least prefer to do so while the vehicle is in motion." Actually, there is heavy and fast traffic, and I cannot see oncoming traffic until it is on top of me. My driveway drops down from the road at about a 1 in 4 grade with no shoulder or flat part to stop on. The drainage is such that my dirveway is frequently covered in a thick sheet of ice(it is a rental, otherwise I'd get off my ass and do something about the problem). So it is a sort of "all or nothing deal" when I exit my driveway. My standard procedure is to engage 4wd to get out onto the road, slow to a near stop to get into 2wd, and then proceed. I wouldn't mind this if oncoming cars could see me, but with the hill, the 60mph traffic cannot see me stopped there and I have had several near-misses. Naturally, I would prefer to be able to continue accelerating and shift out of 4wd at my convenience. Sometimes I just leave it in 4wd until I get to a more convenient stopping place, but that means driving about 1/2mile on dry pavement in 4wd, which I don't like to do for obvious reasons. Now, aren't you sorry you asked? ;-) Braman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:28:13 +0200 Subject: Re: Xfer case mods dbobeck@ushmm.org wrote: > >Umm, Dave, that's how it works in any case... > no, it doesn't pop up until it hits lo range. > if I am wrong about this than no mods would be necessary to make it come out of > 4 hi on the move. just pop the red lever back into neutral. the problem with > shifting on the move into lo-range is in the engagement of two straight cut non Dave, all my Landy's pop up the 4wd knob when the Hi/Lo selector hits neutral... unless... Oh damn! Does this mean I have to take the front output shaft housings off AGAIN? Regards Paul Oxley http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za http://Adventures.co.za - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Nick Bennett" <bennett_nick@hotmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 03:47:15 PST Subject: Roof top tents Anyone out there have any experience with roof top tents? The 600+ukp required to buy a Brownchurch folding tent seem a lot of money for the size of tent you are actually getting. How does this compare to a dormobile roof conversion? The interior will probably go along the lines of a dormobile but ideally I wanted room for a full length roof rack, possibly even one extended imfront of the windscreen. The other reason is that I would like to fit an external roll cage at some point in the future. Anyone able to comment or give advise to a complete newbie!? Nick - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:09:03 -0600 Subject: RE: Roof top tents I can't give you an opinion about the tents. However, I will tell you to relook at the extended front roof rack. They will tend to block your view of traffic lights so unless all your driving is rural backcountry, I would not extend rack beyond the front roof line. cwolfe - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[spamkill: @[0-9][0-9]* input: %s] X-Sender: wrm@192.168.0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 99 07:38:19 -0800 Subject: Re: Land Rovers are y2k compliant Huh??? A Y2K bug issue in a Land Rover would never occur to me. Since this is the leaf spring mail list I'm suprised it occured to anyone else on the list. SO what could go wrong? The battery refuse to let electricity flow down the wire? Solution's simple. Dont show a calander to you battery 8^) My trouble seems to be the Y2K-1 bug. Here it is January and my 2 year old genuine Lucas ignition switch stopped working. Suddenly the base of my windscreen lets in tons of water (Could it be from those holes where my dual wiper motors used to go through?) and my instrument panel mounted tach has water half way up the glass. All that is missing is the little gold fish. I have disassembled tach drying, a replacment ignition switch comming and since it is not raining today I'm going out with a hair dryer and a hose to locate my windscreen leak(s). Oh on the Majove Trail New Years run the big nut holding the ball base of my CB whip antenna loosened and my antenna twisted down shorting the electrical connections. Wouldn't you know I'll have to remove the stove to get at the back of the connection. To remove the stove I'll need to remove the sink cabinet. SO much stuff so little space. Also during the Majove run I've started hearing these cracks up front. Looks like new frame spring bushing time. WHo cares about a possible Y2K bug on series rigs?? Its the Y2K-1 bug that's attacking my car. TeriAnn Wakeman Border to Border Santa Cruz, California Expedition Society twakeman@cruzers.com "Live the adventure" http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman http://www.bordertoborder.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Scheidt <david@infocom.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:39:08 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Re[2]: Xfer case mods On Thu, 21 Jan 1999 dbobeck@ushmm.org wrote: :shifting on the move into lo-range is in the engagement of two straight cut non :synchro gear wheels. It *can* be done with some skillful double clutching. I :have only heard of this but not tried it. Apparently it is required sometimes :in desert travel. Mr. Bobeck may never have engaged low range while the green hell is in motion, but he has had his passanger do it for him. David - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:36:55 -0400 Subject: Re: Roof top tents Ok Nick lets give this bit of a think. Do you want the roof rack to hold stuff or to look cool?. If it's to hold stuff do you need all that stuff with you? If it is to look cool forget it, you know are cool you own a Landy. Right we don't have to worry about the roof rack. Now on to the roll cage. It is possible to design a satisfactory cage for use with a Dormobile type roof. You now have to decide which you want, the rooftop or the Dormobile type. Will you just use it occasionally for camping but mostly as a daily driver? Yes ? then the roof top is more practical as you can take it off and not haul the extra weight or worry about the extra height. No? You plan to use it a lot for camping and expeditions then the Dormie is the best bet. You will quickly come to love the ability to stand inside your living quarters. John and Muddy Nick Bennett wrote: > Anyone out there have any experience with roof top tents? The 600+ukp > required to buy a Brownchurch folding tent seem a lot of money for the > size of tent you are actually getting. How does this compare to a > dormobile roof conversion? The interior will probably go along the lines > of a dormobile but ideally I wanted room for a full length roof rack, > possibly even one extended imfront of the windscreen. The other reason > is that I would like to fit an external roll cage at some point in the [ truncated by list-digester (was 10 lines)] > future. > Anyone able to comment or give advise to a complete newbie - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:41:42 -0500
Subject: Lists
Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> wrote:
>7. WD40 is for cleaning upholstery
>Ah ha, that's why my seats are so slippery and shiny, eh Dave? ;-)
>Paul in Victoria. who bought his used 'deluxe' seats from one Mr. Bobeck...
No, really. WD-40 *is* the best stuff for vinyl. (Got this tip from Chris
"The Badger" Laws, and his business is upholstery.) Look at it this way.
Vinyl is basically petroleum with its molecules rearranged a bit. And what
would be better for oil than another oil? Above all, never use "Armor-All"
or another 'silicone' product. All that will do is make the stitching in
the vinyl brittle. The vinyl will look fine for a while then suddenly the
seat will just come apart.... Cheers
*----jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary----*
| |
| A. P. ("Sandy") Grice |
| Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. |
| Association of North American Rover Clubs |
| 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 |
|(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 |
| |
| (original owner) (pre-production) |
*----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----*
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 19 -> end
| Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:44:56 -0800 Subject: Re: Xfer case mods From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 21:12:47 +0200 Subject: Re: Xfer case mods dbobeck@ushmm.org wrote: >> If I remember correctly the fix was to make the yellow lever pop up when the > red lever was in the neutral position, as it is not until you engage low range >Umm, Dave, that's how it works in any case... I think you'll find that you have to pull the high-low lever (red knob) all the way back into low before the 2wd-4wd (yellow knob) selector will release back to 2wd. I'm talking about a Series III here, maybe the earlier models are different. But that's what it says in the owner's manual and that's what I have always had to do in the vehicle. Simply pulling the high-low lever into neutral does not release the 2wd-4wd selector. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 06:49:25 -1000 Subject: Re: oxen (was ball joint) >> I think you have it backwards. Seems to me that an Bovine >Assualt leads to >> Rover ownership. >Hmmm... and I did a very deep dive into a very shallow swimming >pool at the age of 6. If this is right, then I am probably in real trouble: 5 fell out (ok jumped) the 2nd story of a barn, no hay stack. 6 fell out the back end of a pickup 12 snow sliding accident, had to use my face to stop I was going so fast, 3 whole days left unaccounted for. As far as animal attacks, all I can relocolest is a mob of chickens chasing me at age 3 or 4. Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Martin Bagshaw" <mbags@nortelnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:00:06 -0500
Subject: Landrovers for sale by CND GOV !
The CADC (Crown Assets Distribution Center) in Edmonton has the following
LRs for sale, by sealed bid !
1986 Land Rover model 90FFR (Rolled/Target practice ?)
1991 Land Rover Ambulance
1988 Land Rover Ambulance
Check the link below for pictures and details.
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/cadc/text/west/cars0199-e.htm
The sale is only open to Canadian citizens.
Martin Bagshaw
Ottawa
58 Ser II 88
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 22 -> end
| Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Fri, 22 Jan 99 09:08:09 -0500 Subject: Re[5]: Diff. drain plug removal >7. WD40 is for cleaning upholstery >Ah ha, that's why my seats are so slippery and shiny, eh Dave? ;-) >Paul in Victoria. >who bought his used 'deluxe' seats from one Mr. Bobeck... oops, no sorry, that was left over from one of my more adventurous forays "into the bush" ;) later dave "life is a bowl of even smaller bowls" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Fri, 22 Jan 99 10:59:27 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: Xfer case mods .Now, aren't you sorry you asked? ;-) >Braman Hey Braman! I have your answer. go up the driveway in 4d lo, then you can just mash the lever back up into 2wd hi while you're on the go. simple eh? later dave - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Fri, 22 Jan 99 10:55:29 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: Xfer case mods : >You can shift out of 4wd low range by double clutching, by the way. you can shift out of 4wd low range on the fly without double clutching. the box is made to work this way. put the clutch down and the gearbox in neutral, and mash the red lever up towrd the friewall. been doing that for years, no noises, no problem. if the gearbox is IN gear, and the vehicle is moving, it will make a loud clunk. Is there any speed at which you shouldn't or can't shift between 2-Hi and 4-Hi? tyechnically no, but I can't imagine doing it over 30 or 40 mph. nake sure you put the clutch down first. You shouldn't be doing much over 30-40 in 4wd conditions. > Similarly, is there any way (without xfer-case mods) to just shift to >transfer neutral to pop 4-Hi to 2-Hi on the fly? no. I don't think so. I was supposed to check this out last night but I forgot. later dave "life is a bowl of even smaller bowls" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Fri, 22 Jan 99 11:11:13 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: Window seals >.Umm, I haven't the foggiest on how this could be achieved since series >windows are sliders and are Defenders roll-ups. the "window/door hole" of defenders and series are the the same size, i.e, the doors are interchangeable. the defender door seals will fit but you've got to cut the lip off the seal mounting flange. those that have used them have reported pleasing results. I have also seen well restored vehicles that used the original seals that sealed so well that it was hard to pull the door shut. very nice indeed. I like the defenders style though. only reason I haven't done it is the soft top/hard top swap thing later dave - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 19:05:50 +0200 Subject: Re: Xfer case mods "Faure, Marin" wrote: >I think you'll find that you have to pull the high-low lever (red knob) all the way >back into low before the 2wd-4wd (yellow knob) selector will release back to 2wd. I'm >talking about a Series III here, maybe the earlier models are different. But that's >what it says in the owner's manual and that's what I have always had to do in the >vehicle. Simply pulling the high-low lever into neutral does not release the 2wd-4wd >selector. OK, I'm going to keep quiet from now on, it appears that your L-R's are fundamentally different from the ones I have experience of (I have owned 5, have 4 now and used dozens in the army). If the output shafts are set up properly - i.e.. free to move in the output shaft housing, and the output shaft housing is correctly aligned with the transfer case - with the correct preload on the springs, etc. then the 4wd dog will quite happily disengage when the selector shaft is moved forward into the neutral position. I spent the last two days working on the transfer box / output shaft housing and selectors of one of my R6's, so I've had selectors in chunks - sorry if I sound a little edgy :-) Regards Paul Oxley http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za http://Adventures.co.za - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 19:07:39 +0200 Subject: Re: oxen (was ball joint) Peter Hope wrote: > As far as animal attacks, all I can relocolest is a mob of chickens chasing > me at age 3 or 4. Hey Pete, kicked in the head by chickens... what's that about fowl play? Regards Paul Oxley http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za http://Adventures.co.za - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:17:32 -0800 Subject: Re: Xfer case mods From: Jeff Goldman <roverboy@gis.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 01:25:47 -0500 Subject: Re: Xfer case mods >Is there any speed at which you shouldn't or can't shift between 2-Hi and 4-Hi? Similarly, is there any way (without xfer-case mods) to just shift to transfer neutral to pop 4-Hi to 2-Hi on the fly? According to the manual and my experience, you can shift from 2wd to 4wd any time at any speed. Just push the selector (yellow knob) down and that's it. If you have locking hubs, they obviously have to be engaged before you do this or Expensive Things happen. I believe the problem in shifting from 4wd back to 2wd is that it's difficult or impossible to stop all the transfer gears from turning if the vehicle is moving. Pulling the transfer case into neutral will keep the power from getting through from the transmission, but if the vehicle is moving it won't stop the transfer case mainshaft from turning, and that, I believe, is where the problem lies. This is the reason you have to stop so the High-Low lever can be pulled all the way back into Low to release the 2wd-4wd selector and then moved forward to High. I'd love to know Land Rover's theory for their shifting system, especially since the drive train was patterned after the Jeep's. The Willys Jeep has a very nice two lever arrangement whereby one lever shifts between 2wd and 4wd and the other between High Range and Low Range. The levers are totally independent of each other. Ages ago I drove a Willys pickup for a couple of summers on a ranch in the Colorado Rockies, and while the details are fuzzy I believe I could shift from 2wd to 4wd simply by depressing the clutch and shifting. Going back to 2wd was no different. I did have to stop to go from High to Low range, however, but that was because of the radically different gear ratios, and the fact that the transfer case was not sycromesh (nor is the Land Rover's). As I recall, shifting from Low Range back to High Range could be done with the vehicle moving, as it can in the Land Rover, although you automatically get 2wd High in the Land Rover when you do this. I assume the first Land Rover engineers had a specific reason why they wanted people to be able to shift from 2wd to 4wd without having to use the clutch. So far as I know, that's the only advantage that Land Rover's setup has over the Jeep's. Maybe, as the Land Rover was originally designed to operate all sorts of PTO equipment like hay balers, harvesters, seed drills, etc., the idea was that if you were pulling one of these things and needed 4wd all of a sudden, you wouldn't have to interrupt power to the PTO machine to get it. This is the only reason I can think of as to why Land Rover designed their shifting system the way they did. If anyone else has any other theories, or actually knows, I'd love to hear them. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:08:43 -0800 Subject: RE: Land Rovers are y2k compliant I for one am not too worried about my SII (or my '83 BMW for that matter) being Y2K compliant. I am a little leery about all of those electronic gas (petrol) pump consoles at the local Petro-Can locking up on New Years day, so I think that I'll fill up both vehicles on New Years Eve... Paul in Victoria. attached Y0K joke... Y zero K. Translated from Latin scroll dated 2BC: Dear Cassius: Are you still working on the Y zero K problem? This change from BC to AD is giving us a lot of headaches and we haven't much time left. I don't know how people will cope with working the wrong way around. Having been working happily downwards forever, now we have to start thinking upwards. You would think that someone would have thought of it earlier and not left it to us to sort it all out at this last minute. I spoke to Caesar the other evening. He was livid that Julius hadn't done something about it when he was sorting out the calendar. He said he could see why Brutus turned nasty. We called in Consultus, but he simply said that continuing downwards using minus BC won't work and as usual charged a fortune for doing nothing useful. Surely we will not have to throw out all our hardware and start again? Macrohard will make yet another fortune out of this I suppose. The money lenders are paranoid of course! They have been told that all usery rates will invert and they will have to pay their clients to take out loans. Its an ill wind ......As for myself, I just can't see the sand in an hourglass flowing upwards. We have heard that there are three wise men in the East who have been working on the problem, but unfortunately they won't arrive until it's all over. I have heard that there are plans to stable all horses at midnight at the turn of the year as there are fears that they will stop and try to run backwards, causing immense damage to chariots and possible loss of life. Some say the world will cease to exist at the moment of transition. Anyway, we are still continuing to work on this blasted Y zero K problem. I will send a parchment to you if anything further develops. If you have any ideas please let me know. Plutonius Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement. Nothing can bedone without hope and confidence.-Helen Keller - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:30:57 -1000 Subject: Rovers and Tea (a sighting of sorts) Aloha, for christmas, a relative sent us some "Fortunes Tea". It comes packed in a small wooden box, with a sliding wooden top. I was fiddling with the box last night, trying to determine if I had any use for the box. Pulled all the tea bags out and what looked like a recipe card, guess 'dumped on the counter' would be more accurate. Wife comes in and makes a coment "you and your land rovers". Caught me very much off guard, huh? She hands me the 'recipe' card. It is actually a short story that begins: "Kelli gazed out of the window of the Land Rover at the fast falling sheets of monsoon rains" Last mention of the rover, but it was a nice coincidence. Tea is pretty good also. Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <rgdushin@blackcat.cat.syr.edu> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:33:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: oxen (was ball joint) *** If this is right, then I am probably in real trouble: 5 fell out (ok jumped) the 2nd story of a barn, no hay stack. 6 fell out the back end of a pickup 12 snow sliding accident, had to use my face to stop I was going so fast, 3 whole days left unaccounted for. As far as animal attacks, all I can relocolest is a mob of chickens chasing me at age 3 or 4. *** How's about: 3 Fell out of the back of an 88 while my 5 year old brother was driving...he was just begining to master the hand throttle (legs too short to reach the pedals) and Dad wasn't paying attention... BONK. Won't even go into the number of incidents being kicked, bitten, or chased by large farm animals or Newfoundlands (do they count?)... rd/nige - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Fri, 22 Jan 99 12:50:46 -0500 Subject: Re: Body panel compatibility Hi all, >I am new to the list and have recently purchased a LWB series3 station wagon >in need of a lot of work. What I would like to know firstly is if the doors of >a late 110 (new style hadles) will fit ... Also if I fit a 110 bulkhead and >want to keep the safari roof will I have to use a series windscreen 110 doors will fit the ser III. you have to replace the striker for the latch., and the door stay might be different. 110 bulkhead should fix that. A 110 roof will be necessary if you want to go with a 110 screen. they will all fit the 109. you can retain the SIII bulkhead, just cut off the SIII windsheild hinges and bolt up the 90/110 ones. oh yes and fix up the wipers too... later dave - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[spamkill: @[0-9][0-9]* input: %s] id <01BE4642.52334470@196-31-84-85.iafrica.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 20:03:47 +0200 [spamkill: @[0-9][0-9]* input: %s] Message-ID: <01BE4642.52334470@196-31-84-85.iafrica.com> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[spamkill: mailsend input: %s] Received: from mail0.mailsender.net (mail0.mailsender.net [209.132.1.30]) [spamkill: mailsend input: %s] Received: from tankong.com (209.63.113.196) by mail0.mailsender.net; 22 Jan 1999 10:37:42 -0800 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Kevin Campbell" <KCampbell@AdRem.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:50:19 -0800 Subject: Compression readings Greetings I have just purchase a '65 109 SW 2.25 petrol, which will be shipped to me in a few weeks. One thing I'm puzzling over that came up when I looked at it was the engine compression. Using the "stuff in and hang on" rubber ended gauge available from the seller I only saw 85 Lbs. With a reading this low I was a) surprised it ran and b) expecting blowback from the filler tube or clouds of black smoke - neither of which were present. When it gets to its new home I'll test it again with a known gauge, until then does this make any sense? The engine was surpisingly quiet, with no rattles, wheezes, clackety-clacks that I had been expecting. One other thing I'm expecting to look at is the rear diff, for which a used replacement was thrown in. With the road wheels immobile how much play would you expect to see on the prop shaft? I was seeing about 45 degrees or more, which seemed like a lot. Thanks in advance. Kevin Bothell, WA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:00:54 -0500 Subject: Re: Compression readings Re: Compression gauge: First off, did you have the throttle full open when you did the reading? Frankly, I've never had a bit of luck with the type of gauge that you describe. I wouldn't worry about it till I get it home. Re: Quiet engine: There's got to be something wrong, then.....<grin>. Seriously, this is not unheard of, provided the valves are adjusted properly and everything is set up properly. What do the plugs look like? I'd be more concerend with their condition as an indicator of engine health than that dodgy compression gauge. Lastly, I don't remember you mentioning the oil pressure. If that's good then don't sweat it for the moment. Re: Rear diff: 45 degrees is not unheard of. If you're getting a full quarter-turn then worry, but 45 or thereabouts is not horrid. DOn't worry about it till you get it on the road and see if it clanks or howls. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Kevin Campbell" <KCampbell@AdRem.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:09:39 -0800 Subject: RE: Compression readings Alan, Thanks for the quick reply. With the engine hot at idle oil pressure was about 30psi, more like 50 with a few revs on it (tacho not working). Plugs didn't look bad, perhaps just a little sooty (and no I don't mean furry yellow with a hand up its rear passage). Kevin >Lastly, I don't remember you mentioning the oil pressure. If that's good then >don't sweat it for the moment. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Christian Szpilfogel" <chrisz@nortelnetworks.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:29:31 -0500 Subject: re:V8 carbs Interesting question since I just finished replacing my Zeniths. I was starting to have severe problems with the carbs and I finally broke down and replaced them. The most popular swap seems to be for SUs. I also noticed a write-up in LRO this month describing a Zenith to SU conversion. I pulled mine off of a Rover P6. Given the urgency at the time (last week) and the fact it is bloody cold outside, I had a local British car shop do it. The conversion to the SU is straight forward and if you know carbs it is likely a days work to install and tune. I was thinking of other choices including the Holley's but it doesn't look like it would be ideal for off-roading (at steep angles it look like you would get fuel starved). Used SU's are cheap and they work like a charm. Now that I have switched the car operates incredibly well. I strongly suspect it has never performed this well in its life. I'ld love to check the power output and I hope my LT77 holds out ;-) Cheers, -Christian ------------ Christian Szpilfogel, Ottawa, Ont. Canada 1983 LR110 CSW (UK Spec, April Y-reg) 1972 SIII 88" (UK Spec) 1998 Discovery Malcom writes... I have a 1983 V8 110 CSW with Zenith carbs. The needles are worn, I seem to have trouble getting decent diaphragms and have great difficulty in setting them up correctly. I have been thinking of changing to a Webber but have heard that they give out on steep slopes. Is this true? Is it worth changing? If not can anyone tell me how to set my existing carbs up? Many thanks in advance Malcolm Woodruff - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:32:17 -0500
Subject: RE: Compression readings
Re: Slighly sooty plugs with 50 PSI hot:
Considering the oil pressure is to be 45-65 hot at 2500 RPM or thereabouts I
think you're OK...8*)
The engine sounds like a sweetheart - should be fine. Odds are it could use
carburettor adjustments and a good tune-up, but i've seen worse...and driven it.
ajr
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 40 -> end
| Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:50:15 EST Subject: Re: oxen (was ball joint) In a message dated 1/22/99 8:48:58 AM Pacific Standard Time, phope@hawaii.rr.com writes: << f this is right, then I am probably in real trouble: 5 fell out (ok jumped) the 2nd story of a barn, no hay stack. 6 fell out the back end of a pickup 12 snow sliding accident, had to use my face to stop I was going so fast, 3 whole days left unaccounted for. As far as animal attacks, all I can relocolest is a mob of chickens chasing me at age 3 or 4. >> Then, as you now only have one landie, you apparently are due for many more in the future. Way to go! Zack - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Todd Schlemmer <nullman@ptinet.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:38:13 -0800 Subject: Re: head injuries (was oxen) (was ball joint) I was lifting a hammer (16oz claw!) with a rope and it fell on my noggin when I was about 11. I was building a tree house by myself. --I'm lucky I didn't kill myself out in the woods all alone... mebbe I did. That's about when I started watching Daktari... bboT At 09:34 AM 1/22/99 +0200, you wrote: >DNDANGER@aol.com wrote: >> I have to agree on this one I think we have evidence of a causal link between >> severe head trauma and later ownership of Land Rover vehicles. (Mine was a >> concussion caused by contact with the door pillar of a 1956 Chevy during an >> accident.) Either we all have a screw loose or we just have a craving for a >> safer vehicle. >OK, I guess I have to 'fess up, my head has sustained significant trauma >and battering in it's time. I suppose that explains it all then ... ... >> severe head trauma and later ownership of Land Rover vehicles. (Mine was a Todd Schlemmer Vashon Is., WA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 23:51:08 -0000
Subject: Re: oxen (was ball joint)
charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>. The analytical side of me would like to know whether being a
member of the list AND a L-R owner increases my chances of ABB (Assault
By Bovine)?<<<
I've always thought that it was the other way 'round Paul.
Being kicked in the head by a cow (and bitten on the leg by a pig in my =
case) is WHY we own Land Rovers.
I'm sometimes worried about the reasons why the rest of you own =
them.........
Best Cheers
Frank
+--+--+--+
I !__| [_]|_\___
I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV
"(o)=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW
------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01BE4598.EA9484E0
[ Original post was HTML ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: text/html; ]
[Attachment removed, was 46 lines.]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 43 -> end
| Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]From: "James G.Wolf" <elvenwood@whro.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:41:17 -0500 Subject: e-mail address change To those on the list, my new address is elvenwood@whro.net We will be closing the at&t worldnet address soon. Jim Wolf - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 19:17:38 EST Subject: Re: oxen (was ball joint) In a message dated 1/22/99 3:25:18 PM Pacific Standard Time, frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk writes: I've always thought that it was the other way 'round Paul. Being kicked in the head by a cow (and bitten on the leg by a pig in my = case) is WHY we own Land Rovers. >> And I thought driving Land Rovers was our best chance to survive getting even with the animal. They call em bull bars for a reason. Revenge delayed is revenge intensified. Zack Arbios - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 19:31:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Anti-seize Tom Rowe wrote: > For series owners with metal grills used for cooking, they also make > a food grade that you can use on teh retaining screws. :-) But it won't make any difference since the zinc from the galvanizing will poison you anyway. Regards, David Cockey - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:45:21 -1000 Subject: Re: oxen (was ball joint) >Then, as you now only have one landie, you apparently are due for many more in >the future. Way to go! That's what I was thinking. Now if I can get SWMBO thinking along the same lines. Just ran across a 69 Bugeye 88" at school that is for sale. Same color as my 70, softtop, OD and warn winch. See it almost everyday, really getting to me to get mine back together. Aloha Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SFmms@aol.com Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 21:56:01 EST Subject: Re: Bumper Dumper camping accessory Hi all: True to my engineering training, I could not help but analyze the design limitations of the Bumper Dumper TM camping accessory (can be viewed at http://members.aol.com/bumperdmpr/bumper.htm), and have come up with some suggestions (Bumper Dumper TM Series II ?): 1. A pressure activated kill switch on the seat interlocked with the vehicles ignition so one doesn't inadvertantly drive off with the seat occupied. May also be supplimented with an option to prevent the seat from being left up ;) 2. A work/reading lamp accessory. 3. Deluxe screen with an "occupied" sign and detachable rain shield to allow star gazing. 3. Bumper hanger with a magazine rack. 4. A well vented, special Jerry can for external attachment to the vehicle to transport out the filled bags from the unit for proper disposal. Karen Sindir '74 SIII 88 Red Rufy - WIP (work in progress) '95 Disco EFE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 06:04:48 +0200 Subject: Re: Window seals dbobeck@ushmm.org wrote: > the "window/door hole" of defenders and series are the the same size, i.e, the > doors are interchangeable. the defender door seals will fit but you've got to > cut the lip off the seal mounting flange. those that have used them have > reported pleasing results. Right, I have a 1985 R6 (SA Stage 1) that rolled off of L-R's Blackheath production line with 110 door rubbers - I haven't pulled them to see if the lip has been trimmed. It also has rubber mounted windows on either side of the safari door at the back, the same as 110's, instead of the series style glazed in with putty jobs. Regards Paul Oxley http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za http://Adventures.co.za - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Allan Smith <smitha@candw.lc> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 00:41:32 -0500 Subject: Re: Bumper Dumper camping accessory At 21:56 22/01/99 -0500, you wrote: >Hi all: >True to my engineering training, I could not help but analyze the design >limitations of the Bumper Dumper TM camping accessory (can be viewed at >http://members.aol.com/bumperdmpr/bumper.htm), and have come up with some >suggestions (Bumper Dumper TM Series II ?): >1. A pressure activated kill switch on the seat interlocked with the vehicles >ignition so one doesn't inadvertantly drive off with the seat occupied. Thanks for the best response to this one, IMHO Allan Allan Smith Caribbean Natural Resources Institute (CANARI) Vieux Fort, St. Lucia, West Indies. Tel. + 758 454 6060 Fax. + 758 454 5188 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Bill Fishel" <bfishel@cisnet.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 1995 09:10:42 -0500 Subject: re: head injuries and rover owners >> I have to agree on this one I think we have evidence of a causal link between >> severe head trauma and later ownership of Land Rover vehicles. (Mine was a >> concussion caused by contact with the door pillar of a 1956 Chevy during an >> accident.) Either we all have a screw loose or we just have a craving for a >> safer vehicle. >OK, I guess I have to 'fess up, my head has sustained significant trauma >and battering in it's time. I suppose that explains it all then ... This is getting spooky. Broken arm and leg when I slipped off the grape vines swinging like Tarzan. Wasn't bad enough hitting the ground from 20 feet up but I rolled another 25 or 30 feet to the bottom of the ravine. Only thing I remember was waking up in the hospital. This happened in 1974. Bill Fishel 1974 SIII 88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Bill Fishel" <bfishel@cisnet.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 1995 09:21:57 -0500 Subject: re: mods to bumper dumper *True to my engineering training, I could not help but analyze the design *limitations of the Bumper Dumper TM camping accessory (can be viewed at *http://members.aol.com/bumperdmpr/bumper.htm), and have come up with some *suggestions (Bumper Dumper TM Series II ?): *1. A pressure activated kill switch on the seat interlocked with the vehicles *ignition so one doesn't inadvertantly drive off with the seat occupied. But how are we going to have small children fall off to become the next generation of LR owners? Bill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 07:11:16 +0200 Subject: Re: head injuries and rover owners Bill Fishel wrote: > remember was waking up in the hospital. This happened in 1974. ^^^^ > Bill Fishel > 1974 SIII 88 ^^^^ Spooky all right! Regards Paul Oxley http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za http://Adventures.co.za - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Sona" <franz76@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 23:37:04 -0500
Subject: HOT FOR 1999 !!!
Own your own Adult Website or 900# business.
No chargbacks, Quick payouts.
Unlimited earning potential
Complete program start at only $99 (limited time only)
Request a free color brochure:
reply to mailto:wells2@myremarq.com?subject=brochure
wells2@myremarq.com
with the following information please:
NAME:____________________________
ADDRESS:____________________________
CITY/STATE/ZIP:____________________________
PHONE:____________________________ (optional)
[spamkill: [Ss]ubject[=: ]*[Rr]emove input: %s] remove at:
mailto:hadys@netnoir.net?subject=remove
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 54 -> end
| Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 ->
| Search
Archive Index
| <-
Browser ->
]From: Dale Smith <smithd@bunt.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:24:32 +0100 Subject: Virtual bartender... In a message dated 99-01-19 15:02:04 EST, you write: << By the way, did we ever name our virtual bar tender? More Guiness over here please...:-) Smitty >> How about Paddy O'Furniture How about Nigel O'Leary....:-) Smitty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 55 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 54 lines 2366 [forwarded 153 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1546 [content 1289 forwarded 135 (cut 18) whitespace 0] Land Rover Owner Subscription Information: * All new subscription requests are via the digest. * In addition so subscribing and unsubscribing, the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) file and the last month of daily digests may be retrieved (by mail) from majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net Useful commands for this are 'index lro-digest' which returns a list of files available, as well as 'get lro-digest <filename>', etc. World Wide Web Sites start at http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/pages.html (shadow) http://www2.Land-Rover.Team.Net/pages.html If majordomo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net -B[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990123 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]