[ First Message | Table of Contents | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "John Baker" <daddyo@loxinfo.co.th> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:14:42 +0700 Subject: Removing Tranny I remember reading on an Australian web-page somewhere (sorry, lost the URL), that some guy reckoned you could remove the transmission without removing the seat box. There weren't any details, though. I can only presume that he spilt the various transmission components in situ. Not really relevant, but has anyone tried this?? I think it can be done. I recently removed my tranny by first taking out the transfer case and output assy which is easily done. Then undid the bolts holding the tranny to the engine and pulled it back. Couldn't pull it out, not enough room, so I removed the pinion cover assy (correct name??) and removed the bell housing, and then pulled the gearbox out. At least that's how I recall it. For reinstalling I did raise the sit box as I wanted to install the gearbox in one piece. It may be possible to pull out the gear box without disassembly, but I have a gear lock gizmo installed that interfered with any possibility of doing that. John Bangkok - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: RoverNut@aol.com Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:01:31 EST Subject: re:side of road Series III In a message dated 3/10/99 7:56:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, MAILER- DAEMON@aol.com writes: << << Still, i want it! :) Asking $2,200 O.B.O. Needs much work! Was wondering if you knew of sources for buying a frame and/or repairing it. Am I crazy to even consider this? >> I think I would work under the "OBO" frame of reference. If the truck is badly rusted out, it will cost you more to get it runningthan if you were to buy a LR that had a few patches, some dings, etc, but solid nonetheless, for a bit more. I'm not sure what the plow's worth, and maybe the engine and tranny are great, but it sounds like a money pit. Bad frame is often followed by bad bulkhead. Add in springs and your at $3k just to get a rolling chasis. Add that to the $2.2k you'd spend on it and you've got $5200 to buy a truck with, and I'm sure you could find a decent runner up in Canada for that. Good luck Alex Maiolo 49 Series I 95 Disco >> --part0_921070893_boundary [Attachment removed, was 32 lines.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:15:15 -0400 Subject: Re: Spam killing Kirk Hillman wrote: > I have sent four messages to the LRO list and the major but I keep > getting spam killed. Hopefully someone will actually get to read this > and do something about it. It's not like I am trying to sell something, > I just want to be loved... :^P > Kirk Hillman and Banshee Because so much spam comes from "hotmail" addresses the Major is quite hostile to anyone posting from a hotmail Email address. Try changing your reply to address in your mail preferences. JOhn - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:24:44 -0400 Subject: Re: Rear main seal - remove tranny or engine? Jeff Goldman wrote: > Just discovered puddles left everywhere are mostly from the bellhouse > plug opening which leads me to rear main seal. Drips when engine is running > at moderate speeds. Nothing with it off (so it's not in the gearbox). > I have a removable transmission crossmember. So, is it easier to remove > the engine or tranny to just replace this seal. It's enough of a puddle to > warrant a replacement. Stupidly, and I knew this would come back to bite > me, I didn't renew the seal when the engine was out a few months back!! [ truncated by list-digester (was 12 lines)] > Jeff Goldman > Boston, MA Well.... I am going to give you advise that is contrary to all the others. I have done main seals both ways and now I always remove the engine. This has nothing to do with the actual job of removing the engine or the gearbox but the fact that the seal replacement is sooo much easier when the engine is upside down on an engine stand. Those cork T pieces can cause much grief when you are working on your back with bits of mud and grease dropping in your eyes. You can also take the opportunity to check on how your crankshaft bearing are doing. John and Muddy PS some of the methods described to avoid removing the seat box seem like 10 times more work that removing the box. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: John Cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:28:57 -0400 Subject: Re: Kirks Idling again > I thought I had it licked, but I cannot get a solid idle on my > SIIa. Also, there is a fairly substantial hesitation when I give it > some gas, and I don't mean putting the petal to the floor. I have the > 2-1/4 L petrol with a 2 bbl Weber carburetor. I let it sit there for a > while and just idle until it warmed up. I noticed while sitting in the > drivers seat a few things: > -an oscillation between 1000 and 1200 rpm in a frequency of [ truncated by list-digester (was 44 lines)] > PS- I hope this goes through this time. The major must think I am MR. > SPAM, because he keeps killing my messages. Kirk it sounds very much like you a vacuum leak. There are a number of place where this is likely. 1. the carb to manifold connection, there are 2 gaskets and a plastic isolation block. Look care fully at the block as an undetected crack can cause problems. 2. The manifold to head gasket. 3. The intake manifold itself needs to checked for cracking. 4. It is possible that the brake servo is leaking either, externally where the white plastic elbow enters or where the master cylinder attaches, or internally through the diaphragm The sucking sound you hear would support the idea that the problem is with vacuum. The valve cover either on or off would not cause such a sound. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:46:28 -0800 Subject: Re: Handcranking From: Olafur Agust Axelsson <olafura@ti.is> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 14:05:44 +0000 Subject: Re: Handcranking >I do alot of handcranking as the battery is always giving me a hard time! - But I was wondering! - I find it odd that when cold the LR only needs half a crank and it fires - but when its hot I have to go on and on - maybe ten cranks before it fires up! - Its a petrol engine! Someone told me that the pistonrings would most likely be shot and when hot it has a lot of oil in the piston chambers! No, it doesn't mean your rings are shot. The engine is hard to start by hand crank when it's hot. Mine has been that way since I bought it new. Even on the electric starter it seems to take more cranking to get a hot engine to fire. When it's cold, the engine fires the moment the starter begins to turn it over. The cause may be that the hot engine leans out the fuel-air mixture during starting, making it more difficult to ignite until the mixture is enriched by the "fresh" mixture being pulled into the manifold by the rotation of the engine. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:35:45 Subject: Re: Rear main seal - remove tranny or engine? I'd pull the engine. Getting the oil seal and bearing cap seals in position while fighting gravity could be a major source of frustration. I found that getting both these seals in properly was one of the trickiest parts of the rebuild and mine was on a stand with gravity working for me. Aloha Peter At 11:46 PM 3/9/99 -0500, you wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:27:00 -0800 Subject: more tranny evolutions Speaking of weird tranny removal, has anyone read that story about the Australian who removed, repaired and replaced his transmission singlehandedly at night in the midst of a raging flooded stream without spilling the oil? It must be right up there on the list of Really Cool Extemporaneous Engineering Exploits. I hope I never am called to perform such feats... Clinton PS, is it just me or has LROI turned into a bloated, advert filled, content lacking, rehashed-old-articles rag? I am letting my subscription lapse, at least until I can afford (and want) a Freelander or a checker plate Defender... Probably am going to try out that new NA lr magazine for a year and see how it stacks up. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:26:00 -0800
Subject: Tranny + floor removal
I think it can be done. I recently removed my tranny by first taking out
the transfer case and output assy which is easily done. Then undid the
bolts holding the ...............lock gizmo installed that
interfered with any possibility of doing that.
This sounds like a lot of convoluted time consuming evolution to save
a couple of hours of seat box removal/reinstallation. If I was this
adamant about not removing the seat box, I would enlist the help of
Mr. Angle Grinder and just cut off the transmission crossmember and
then reweld it once the job was done (or better, convert it to a
removable type for the next time the job is to be done). Of course,
if I was going to do the latter, then I would probably take the seat
box off anyway to get better acess...
It may be just me, but when I am dealing with large lumpish pieces of
metal that can mash me, I like to have as much room to play as
possible. I have generally found that if I take the time to remove
various bits of in-the-way-metal from around the job I am doing, it
saves time in the long run, or at least reduces the amount of frikkin'
and frakkin' that is involved. Besides, it then gives you a chance to
hit all those nuts and bolts with some anti seize so that the next
time you do the job they just grease off there.
Keeping the above in mind, I will probably bruise my knuckles and make
my truck blush a bit when I try to remove the starter without removing
the wing first...
On a different subject, has anyone ever replaced the door sills on a
109 pickup or an 88 with something slightly more substantial? (I am
talking about the bits the floor and seat box bolts to). I am betting
that some decent c-channel would make a much more robust connection in
this area. Hell, even some folded aluminum foil might be stronger!
Clinton "doesn't always practice what he preaches" Coates
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 10 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]
From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:17:49 EST
Subject: Re: floor removal and Stiffeners
In a message dated 3/10/99 10:11:18 AM Pacific Standard Time,
ccoates@GOLDER.com writes:
On a different subject, has anyone ever replaced the door sills on a
109 pickup or an 88 with something slightly more substantial? (I am
talking about the bits the floor and seat box bolts to). I am betting
that some decent c-channel would make a much more robust connection in
this area. >>
I'm launching into the same or similar project and would be interested in some
others experiences in this area. My drivers side is exponentially worse than
the passenger (right) side, but I need to upgrade seatbelt attach while I'm
there.
Zack
Rusty 109
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 11 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:27:17 -0800 Subject: LROI was Re: more tranny evolutions Clinton Coates wrote: > PS, is it just me or has LROI turned into a bloated, advert filled, content > lacking, rehashed-old-articles rag? FWIW I recently moved and they couldn't seem to forward magazines or change my address although they managed to send a subscription renewal to the old address. I probably won't renew. LRW did manage to keep up and I prefer them anyway. I'm seriously considering subscribing to LRM (a bit more like LROI than LRW). Jeremy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:31:18 -0800 Subject: RE: Tranny + floor removal I have to say that I am a steadfast 'up through the floor' fan when it comes to transmission removal. 'Off with the roof too,' I say. I've spent quite a few hours on my back under lesser vehicles with a transmission balanced on my chest trying to sink it home into the back end of the crank and cursing up a storm. Standing beside the tranny with it suspended from the rafters on a hand winch is MUCH preferable. With a little practice, the roof, floors & seat box can be removed in just over an hour. Paul in Victoria. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wise Owl Innovation Incorporated" <wiseowl@direct.ca> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:50:30 -0800 Subject: Re: floor removal and Stiffeners Zack this sounds like an improvement but you have to consider the non standard nature of the change. With the prices of good original 109s going through the roof i would hesitate....ray ---------- > From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com > To: lro@playground.sun.com > Subject: Re: floor removal and Stiffeners > Date: Wednesday, March 10, 1999 10:17 AM > In a message dated 3/10/99 10:11:18 AM Pacific Standard Time, > ccoates@GOLDER.com writes: [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > ccoates@GOLDER.com writes: > On a different subject, has anyone ever replaced the door sills on a > 109 pickup or an 88 with something slightly more substantial? (I am > talking about the bits the floor and seat box bolts to). I am betting > that some decent c-channel would make a much more robust connection in > this area. >> > I'm launching into the same or similar project and would be interested in some > others experiences in this area. My drivers side is exponentially worse than > the passenger (right) side, but I need to upgrade seatbelt attach while I'm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Kirk Hillman" <kdhillman@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:39:43 PST
Subject: Pressure regulators
List,
Since my main email isn't liked by the major I wanted to resubmit a
couple of messages that were killed:
I know a few of you seem to think that a fuel pressure regulator
isn't necessary, but here is my limited experience. I replaced my
Zenith with a Weber 2bbl. The instructions that came with the Weber
stated that is was not to be run outside of a 1.5-3 psi envelope. I use
a mechanical fuel pump and it wouldn't run until I put the regulator
on. Even if it did run though, I would still have the regulator in
line. You see I have a backup electric fuel pump. While on the trail
once we returned to a hill that we had come down that we weren't going
to make it up. The truck just kept dying. The pump was installed but
not wired. So my co-pilot and I patched together a wiring set-up in the
dark. We drove up the hill no problem after that. I will note that I
still had the Zenith on at the time, and that I am sure it was the mech.
fuel pump that was the weak point, not the carb. The point is that I
WANT to have the electric pump as a backup, and with the Weber the
pressure needs to be reduced from the 7 or something psi that my pump
produces.
Additionally, I would add that I understand that the Weber stalls at
extreme angles. I have never experienced this (and I thought some of my
angles were extreme!). A guy on another list wrote that a significant
improvement can be had by replacing the brass float with a plastic one.
He even had the part number, but I don't have it now. He also noted
that you could decide to stall going up or going down. The way that
most 2bbl Weber's are installed means they should stall pointing
uphill. Rotate them 180 degrees and you stall going down hill.
Personally I would rather stall going up, because at least then I have a
winch line to string up and secure the vehicle to let it down if needs
be. But again, I have never stalled with this carb and the BRASS float
to date.
The regulator is up to you, the plastic float is up to you, but
having fun in your rover is NOT an option, it's an obligation. :-)
Cheers,
Kirk Hillman
and 'The Banshee Hillman'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 15 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: "Risely, Chris" <ChrisRisely@aec.ca> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:48:07 -0700 Subject: free to a good home Hello all. Just a quick note. Having just moved to a smaller shop, I find that I've simply got too many spare parts to keep everything. Consequently, I'm going to either give away, or scrap a large volume of series 1 parts. The main space takers are a number of series IOE engines that are currently lying on my shop floor. I have 1 good 2000cc IOE short block, and one useable condition, complete, 1600cc IOE engine! Both engines were runners, but have been sitting for the past 4 years. For anyone contemplating a resto, they're yours for the taking. I'm located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and I'll be starting on the cleanup this coming weekend, (mar. 13/14th) so if you're interested in the engines (or any other series 1 bits) please contact me before then: I'd rather give the parts to another Rover owner than scrap them, but I desperately need the space to re-assemble my project Rover Regards, Chris Risely. e-mail feedback to rockmage@xoommail.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Kirk Hillman" <kdhillman@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:59:29 PST
Subject: Snow chains
Here is another on that the major tossed:
I just thought I would send a little note to the list with my
jubilation about snow chains. A while ago I was trying to decide what
method I would use to overcome the really sticky situations we seem to
get into. Limited slip... lockers... chains? Wisdom is slowly sneaking
up on me so I decided to try the simplest method, chains. I have been
quite badly stuck once since I bought my V-block chains. Of course I
had not used them, thus I was stuck. Putting the chains -under- the
tires was what got me out in the end though. :-)
Tonight I was working on a few things on the Banshee and upon
completion it required a test drive, as always. I went a couple of
blocks and ended up at the neighbourhood ice rink. The plowed drifts
here seemed the ideal place to play for a moment before returning home.
I can tell you that I didn't get that far. In fact I got nowhere. Just
after getting in with all four wheels I was spinning them all. I wasn't
stuck, just humbled a little. Then it dawned on me that this would be
an ideal time to try on the chains, since I was close to home, there was
enough light from the rink that I could see, and it couldn't have been
more than 20 degrees C below zero. Perfect! I only tried putting on
the chains when I bought them, which happened to be before the snow and
cold came. All in all it went pretty well. Those tiny drifts proved no
trouble at all now! I drove over these drifts and such for a few
minutes listening for any metal thrashing or generally unhappy sounds
but heard none. I stopped to make sure they were all still snug and
re-adjusted each one a little tighter. Now I crawled back to my house
at such a turtle speed that it didn't even budge the speedo from zero.
I wasn't going to win any races today. I got into my snow-covered
driveway but had to keep going, the urge was too great. Now my back
yard has LR signature tracks all over the place. I know you are all
thinking I am absolutely mad... and I have to agree, but this was
awesome. We have a very large yard, especially for in the city. It is
probably 200 feet across the back which borders on a wild parkway. Our
lot is totally protected from the weather so the snow that falls here
doesn't get blown away. That means that there is currently about 2 to
2-1/2 feet of snow back there. I was driving around as if there wasn't
half that much. I even climbed the back hill that begins with a 2 foot
step (the lawn tractor won't do it in the summer!). The only thing that
even slowed me down was a pile of snow about 4-1/2 feet deep that was
left from shovelling the sidewalk to the shop, and that was only because
I wasn't using momentum. These things are incredible!
I think I can safely say that of all the times I have gotten stuck
in my LR, there isn't once that would have been a problem had I chained
up first. There are still a few hills I wouldn't have made it up, but
no one is perfect. :-) Honestly, if you don't have chains and you do
any kind of off roaming where you will encounter mud or snow, get
chains... I have four and wouldn't trade them for anything now. It will
open up whole new vistas of opportunities. Now, what about air lockers
AND chains...
Regards,
Kirk Hillman
and 'The Banshee Hillman'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 17 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]
From: "Kirk Hillman" <kdhillman@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:09:09 PST
Subject: Spam Killing
John,
The ironic thing is that the only messages getting through to the
list are ones from my hotmail address. I didn't even use a hotmail
address until I started having problems. My real address is on the
@Home network (Shaw, etc.). So any time you see a spamkill that has
something to the effect of "mail.rdc1.ab.home.com", that was me being
ousted by the major.
And John, thanks for the advice on the vacuum problem. I will look
into it as soon as possible. I have to get it running right so I can go
play in the snow! :-P
Kirk Hillman
and 'The Banshee Hillman'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 18 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 99 12:43:38 -0800 Subject: Re: floor removal and Stiffeners > On a different subject, has anyone ever replaced the door sills on a >109 pickup or an 88 with something slightly more substantial? (I am ;>talking about the bits the floor and seat box bolts to). I am betting ;>that some decent c-channel would make a much more robust connection in ;>this area. I can't say that I have actually done it...yet, but it seems to me that you could replace those sections AND the lower sills with a specially designed set of sliders. The end result could provide you with considerably more side impact protection. Try a slider anchor at the bulkhead, front and rear fuel tank and front rear spring hanger outriggers. It should provide a world of additional strength. Just a future project TeriAnn Wakeman The Green Rover, rebuilt and Santa Cruz, California and maintained using parts from twakeman@cruzers.com British Pacific 800-554-4133 http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 19 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wolfe, Charles" <CWolfe@smdc.org> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:59:11 -0600 Subject: Hi Jack Lift anchor site. What is the best way to use the hijack lift to say change a tire? Where can I anchor the lifting plate of the jack? Seems to me I need to but somesort of siderail on vehicle to use effectively. Cwolfe - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Ian Mitchell <imitchel@chopin.fis.puc.cl> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 18:11:20 -0800 Subject: Easy SII Questions Hi all I am now back from my 3 1/2 week holiday exploring Southern Chile in our SII. We only bought it a couple of weeks before we went and what with the panic of getting it ready to go, I had no time to anything other than the absolute necessities. Now that we are back I can spend some time fiddling. Where SHOULD the main beam switch be on a SII? I say should because it has been rewired (without any colour coding!) and the beam isn't actually connected at the lamp end! How do you get at the back of the headlamp which is on the driver's side (LHD)? The only way I can see is to remoce the grill, but mine is Riveted on - should it be screwed on? As it is a very early SII I have a SI engine but I don't know if it is a 1.6 or a 2.0 (I suspect the latter). Tonight I will have a look for the engine number. The thought suddenly struck me that I may have a SI gearbox. Is there a number which I can look for which will identify my gearbox and where is it (the number, not the gearbox!)? We had a great time exploring the Carratera Austral, a LONG untarmaced (don't know the correct name) road stretching from Puerto Montt to the South of Chile. We drove about 1500km on it. Broke a shock absorber when we hit a pothole, in fact when I looked underneath the whole connection between the spring hanger plate and the shock absorber had broken off. The Shock absorber and plates were still there but all connecting pieces were gone. Fortunately we were near Cohaique, the biggest town in the region and just a few days earlier had been talking to a mechanic who owned a 1955 SI. So I introduced him to our landie and then he set to work fixing it. It was a fun day! Good to be back (he lied). Ian -- Dr. Ian H Mitchell Facultad de Fisica Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Santiago Tel + 56 2 686 4985 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:08:13 -0800 Subject: RE: Hi Jack Lift anchor site. Front bumper or rear crossmember works for me. Paul in Victoria. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 22 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Risely, Chris" <ChrisRisely@aec.ca> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:12:39 -0700 Subject: RE: Hi Jack Lift anchor site. I've found three places to use the high lift on a stock Rover. Front bumper, rear bumper, and the bulkhead, right beside the outriggers. On my modified S1, I've got saddle tanks, and the skid plates under the tanks are fitted with anchor points for the high-lift. NB: for anyone with modified suspension, I've got a clip rigged up on the frame above each axle, and I use a chained looped from the hook, around the axle, and back to the hook, to limit axle travel when extracting the Rover from a hole, or changing a tire. Much safer than jacking it 3 feet up, just to get the wheel to leave the ground. regards, CR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 23 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:26:00 -0800
Subject: more on tranny removal
I have to say that I am a steadfast 'up through the floor' fan when it
comes to transmission removal. 'Off with the roof too,' I say. I've spent
quite a few hours o............the tranny with it suspended from the
rafters on a hand winch is MUCH preferable.
Much agreed. Though when I pulled my tranny, I used a 2x4 on the top
of the inside lip of the roof sill and a comealong to support the
tranny. Worked a treat, actually. If I had rafters, I would probably
have pulled the roof though.
Of course, now I own 1/4 shares in a 4 ton engine hoist which should
make the whole job a *lot* easier next time.
With a little practice, the roof, floors & seat box can be removed in just
over an hour.
The kind of practice we all do not want to get ;-) The second time
is a lot easier too, if you grease up all the bolts the first time...
Clinton "preaching the greasey gospel" Coates
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 24 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]
From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:21:00 -0800
Subject: RE: floor removal and Stiffeners
Ray makes a very good point...
Zack this sounds like an improvement but you have to consider the non
standard nature of the change. With the prices of good original 109s going
through the roof i would hesitate....ray
However, if one engineers it so that the sections are just stronger
but bolt up to the same mountings, then this is a non-permanent mod.
The extent of modifications that one does to their rovers is becoing a
touchy subject these days. I am not going to get into it very far
becasue my nomex suit is at the drycleaners right now. Changing
things to non standard does tend to reduce value for originality.
*however*, replacing a cruddy part with a well engineered/better
replacement that bolts on with no mods to the original truck is a
viable alternative IMHO. These kinds of things can be removed at a
future date to easily bring the truck to stock. I would tend to put
this in the same class as a careful alternator mod (my delco
installation required zero cutting of wires or grinding...1 hour and
it is back to stock with its wimpy genny) or a non invasive modern
seat mod (again, my fiero seats required zero drilling of holes).
**************
TeriAnn also has a good point...
I can't say that I have actually done it...yet, but it seems to me that
you could replace those sections AND the lower sills with a specially
designed set of sliders. The end result could provide you with
considerably more side impact protection. Try a slider anchor at the
bulkhead, front and rear fuel tank and front rear spring hanger
outriggers. It should provide a world of additional strength.
Just a future project
I like this. One could also incorporate a low profile step as well.
Keeping in mind what Ray sez about originality, one of the defining
characteristics of the rover is that it is so easily modifiable. This
can be bad (makes it easy for numbnuts to butcher/alter/bodge things)
or it can be good (makes it easy for careful people to make really
cool tailored vehicles). I think we all know where TeriAnn's
inclinations lie...
I know a guy down the street from me who has a seriously fiddled 86".
It has a 2" body lift, a custom steering box from something or other
and a GM V6 engine. It looks seriously bad. *However*, the way he
did it, it is about 1 weeks work from stock. Unbolt the body, get
some help from Mr. Angle Grinder to take off the fabbed mounting
points, unbolt the steering box, pull the engine, paint the chassis,
install the 2.0l, install the steering box, put the body back on and
instant stock Series 1. OK, it is a bit involved. But my point is
that it can be done without all that much trouble.....compared to
dropping in a 350 V8 into an 80" at least....
Is it warm in here, or is it just me?
Clinton
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 25 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: Zaxcoinc@aol.com Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 16:59:40 EST Subject: Re: floor removal and Stiffeners In a message dated 3/10/99 10:40:41 AM Pacific Standard Time, wiseowl@direct.ca writes: << Zack this sounds like an improvement but you have to consider the non standard nature of the change. With the prices of good original 109s going through the roof i would hesitate....ray >> I've just got to do something about the rusted places at the base of the doors and at the base of the B pillar so the rest of the pieces don't flap. If there was something better I'd investigate, otherwise new braces and pieces and again in twenty years? Zack - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Vel Natarajan <vel@enteract.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 16:19:36 -0600 Subject: SIIA points & condenser - sources? I was told that I could buy new points & a condenser for my '65 SIIA at Pep Boys if I asked for an MGB part number. Just wanted to confirm if this is correct before I made a trip over there. Hopefully it will be cheaper than a US mailorder house... Vel Natarajan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 27 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 99 15:03:21 -0800 Subject: RE: floor removal and Stiffeners > Ray makes a very good point... ; ;>Zack this sounds like an improvement but you have to consider the non ;>standard nature of the change. With the prices of good original 109s going ;>through the roof i would hesitate....ray <SNIP> ;>one of the defining ;>characteristics of the rover is that it is so easily modifiable. This ;>can be bad (makes it easy for numbnuts to butcher/alter/bodge things) ;>or it can be good (makes it easy for careful people to make really ;>cool tailored vehicles). I think we all know where TeriAnn's ;>inclinations lie... For me it was an easy start. A previous owner had made body cuts inside the rear body and on the rear panels. There was no going back to stock without replacing the entire body behind the seats when I got the car. But back then these Land Rover things were worthless when they were worn out. I paid US$ 350 for mine and thought I paid too much considering it's condition. Back when I cut the hole for the propane tank access door and the one for the front left fuel tank, good running series II Land Rovers were worth about US$ 2500 and people were still out there looking for 109 two doors to convert to trailers. Well Rover came back to the U.S. with advertising and the prices for the surviving series cars seem to be skyrocketing. My 109 is very far from stock but she meets my needs and that is what is important to me. If I were to sell her I would ask considerably more than what a stock series II 109 pickup would go for. But it really doesn't matter to me what value society puts on The Green Rover. The car meets my needs much better than a stock one would and with 20 plus years of ownership I can not imagine ever parting with her. It is just funny money when you never intend to sell a car. I wonder if you can get 109 sized burial plots? That would be the ultimate Land Rover expedition. TeriAnn Wakeman If you send me direct mail, please Santa Cruz, California start the subject line with TW - twakeman@cruzers.com I will be sure to read the message http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman "How can life grant us the boon of living..unless we dare" Amelia Earhart 1898-1937 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 99 15:28:30 -0800 Subject: Re: Easy SII Questions > Where SHOULD the main beam switch be on a SII? I say should because it >has been rewired (without any colour coding!) and the beam isn't >actually connected at the lamp end! There should be a foot switch to go between high beam and low beam. A blue wire should go from the ignition/headlamp switch to the foot switch. This provides the power. There should be a blue wire with a white stripe and a blue wire with a red stripe going from the switch, out a hole in the side kick panel, across the bulkhead near the bell housing up the right side. The wires go to four way connectors near the right side of the radiator. There is a plug that connects to the rear of the headlamps. The plug has a short subharness that comes out of the headlamp bucket. The one on the right plugs directly into the four way connectors. The one on the left comes out and connects to another subharness that runs in front of the radiator on the underside of the top radiator support to connect to the four way connectors on the right side. The black wires in the sub harnesses are the ground leads and they connect to a Lucas ground connector on the underside of the top radiator support. New headlamp plugs with subharnesses are available new. >How do you get at the back of the headlamp which is on the driver's side >(LHD)? The only way I can see is to remoce the grill, but mine is >Riveted on - should it be screwed on? The grill should be held in place by the two screws holding the Land Rover name plate to the front bulkhead. If someone rivited the plate on you will need to drill it out. You get at the rear of the left headlamp bucket through the grill opening. The headlamp buckets are held to the front bulkhead by screws that are accessable then you remove the headlamp rims. The headlamp subharnesses are removed from the front after removing the headlamp. The plug is too large to fit through the wire access opening in the rear of the buckets. Best of luck with your project. TeriAnn Wakeman The Green Rover, rebuilt and Santa Cruz, California and maintained using parts from twakeman@cruzers.com British Pacific 800-554-4133 http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:32:24 -0800 Subject: RE: Easy SII Questions I will add one point to TeriAnn's verbal wiring schematic: On my SII (1961) the wires come up from the footswitch to a hockey puck shaped 6 way junction box on top of the footwell under the steering column and from there forward to the lights. One wire from the high beam circuit also goes back to the dash panel high beam warning light. Paul in Victoria. http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:53:25 +0100
Subject: Re: Positive earth to negative earth!
Disconnect the positive terminal of the battery. Insert a low wattage
(indicator type) 12v lamp IN SERIES between battery positive and
positive cable to starter motor.
If the lamp lights up - however dimly - then you have something,
somewhere which is shorting to earth (negative) or drawing current in
some way.
Disconnect things one at a time to eliminate the culprit.
A good quality amperemeter inserted in the same place will also work.
DO NOT try to start motor with lamp/meter in series - you will fry the
wire and bu''er your meter.
This method has the advantage of giving an indication that you have a
fault, making it easier to find!
If the lamp does not light (or if the meter does not show any current
draw) - then the battery is losing it's charge.
Good luck
Adrian Redmond
CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond)
Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark
telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66
telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64
telefacsimile / data +45 86 57 24 46
mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64
mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 54 22 66
mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66
e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk
Visit the "Native Experience" website at
http://www.channel6.dk/native
Contact the "Native Experience" film unit in Alaska
telephone +1 (907) 230 0359
e-mail channel6@alaska.net
Visit our homepages! www.channel6.dk
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 31 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:12:54 +0100
Subject: Getting things out and in again...
If the bodywork and underside is clean and free of crud and underseal,
then puilling a seatbox our or removing a wing is a half hour job at the
most.
If you are doing a rebuild, plan for the next partial spilt down.
Replace hard to get at nuts with captive plates ( small straps of steel
bar with bolts nuts welded to them) - then you can remove and reinstall
these from the easy side.
Make sure that such difficult bolts are no longer than needed for the
job - why fight for 20 minutes with a spanner and a gallon of WD40 just
to turn a nut off an extra inch of thread which serves no other purpose
than to rust and render removal impossible. If you need a long bolt to
pul body parts togethere when assembling (like the seat belt bracket -
seat box side flanges - rear tub - bottom sill member, then use a long
bolt to pull togther, insert a short bolt in the other hole and tighten,
then replace the first long bolt with a short one. Seems a waste of time
at the time? Beats fighting useless thread in three years.
If pulling the wing seems too much trouble to replace the starter motor,
consider pulling the manifolds instead. Actually it is marginally
possible to remove a starter motor without pulling anything.
Several others have replied with comments about making space to work - I
cannot agree more, it's better to do without the wagon for a few more
days, and remove everything which is in the way. Much safer too!
Happy knuckle-chaffing!
Adrian Redmond
http://www.channel6.dk/native
[Attachment removed, was 1 lines.]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 32 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:16:33 +0100
Subject: Re: Tranny + floor removal
If you have a few spare friends - pull the florplates and tunnel cover,
disconnect the door sils from the door post at the firewall end,
disconnect roof from windscreen, and lift the entire tub and roof,
including seatbox (take the handbrake with you).
It sounds fun - it is!
Adrian Redmond
http://www.channel6.dk/native
[Attachment removed, was 1 lines.]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 33 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: John Karlsson <karlsson@edgenet.net> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:14:45 -0500 Subject: RE: floor removal and Stiffeners At 03:03 PM 3/10/99 -0800, you wrote: >I wonder if you can get 109 sized burial plots? That would be the >ultimate Land Rover expedition. A few years ago a woman here in Rhode Island was buried in her Corvair. I recently saw a news article about how some body shop shortened the car to meet burial requirements. So I suppose a 109 might be possible. I've always thought a burlap sack would be my choice when the time comes, but maybe I should start thinking about my 88". We've been together for almost 30 years now, and I can't imagine that we will ever part! John Karlsson Hope Valley, RI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:19:10 +0100
Subject: Re: floor removal and Stiffeners
what's a slider or slider-anchor?
:-)
Adrian Redmond
http://www.channel6.dk/native
[Attachment removed, was 1 lines.]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 35 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]
From: Clinton Coates <ccoates@GOLDER.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 16:58:00 -0800
Subject: Question for the mage
Hi Chris,
I was just wondering if you had managed to assemble some pictures of
the mage? I have a couple of more questions regarding the transfer
case mount and a few other things. I have found a good supply of free
MB engines and transmissions for mock up work (and good used runners
for not that much more...).
How much longer until the mage is running again?
Clinton
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 36 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: DONOHUEPE@aol.com Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 21:51:12 EST Subject: Copper coil around the exhaust Somebody wrote recently about coiling copper tubing around the exhaust manifold. This, of course, makes good sense but begs the question of where to put the sour mash kettle and the cooling coils. It could be explained to revenuers as a British accessory for brewing tea. Paul Donohue 1965 Land Rover (not a coiler) 109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 21:56:53 -0500 Subject: Re: Easy SII Questions (gearbox) Ian Mitchell wrote: > As it is a very early SII I have a SI engine but I don't know if it is > a > 1.6 or a 2.0 (I suspect the latter). Tonight I will have a look for > the > engine number. 2.0 if it is the original engine, same as the late SIs. Ivins claims '58 SII 88 petrol engines have serial numbers starting with 141800001. I don't know if that holds true for the 2.0 engines. > The thought suddenly struck me that I may have a SI > gearbox. Is there a number which I can look for which will identify my > gearbox and where is it (the number, not the gearbox!)? > the SI and SII gearboxes are identical until the suffix "A" boxes were introduced in either late SIIs or early SIIAs. The bellhousings differ between a 2.0 liter F-head petrol engine, and the 2.25 petrol and diesel OHV engines. SI and SII with the same type engines used the same bellhousings. The SII hydraulic clutch linkage was designed so that the bellhousings and internal clutch release system could be carried over from the SI which has a mechanical clutch linkage. BTW, the 6 cyl LR engine had the same bellhousing bolt pattern as the 2.0 liter. All SIIs up to gearbox suffix "A" have the same transfer case. The part number is different for the SII transfer case from the SI, and the differences appear to be in the speedometer drive housing. The front output shaft housings are identical between late SI and SII. Regards, David Cockey - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john taylor <jht@easynet.ca> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:07:42 -0500 Subject: Re: clunk in 4wd I have a similar clunk every so often and feel it is due to having a tooth missing on the spider gear on the front. I am waiting for a more dramatic manifestation before I motivate myself to fix it - if that is the problem! John Taylor IIa v6 bastard - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 39 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: urbncby@sgi.net (Scott C. Wickham Jr.)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 23:06:54 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: floor removal and Stiffeners
>what's a slider or slider-anchor?
A rock slider. It will protect the lower sides of the vehicle when you
come down on a rock. Slider-anchor...I think that would be where you put
the foot of the high-lift so when you jack it up, the lifting foot won't
slide around and let the truck fall on you.
Scott C. Wickham Jr.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
1972 Ser III
Zebra truck
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 40 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]
From: urbncby@sgi.net (Scott C. Wickham Jr.)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 23:12:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: soft top
Does anybody have an OLD, HOLEY, DUCT-TAPED, soft top for an 88"?
Looking for one for a pattern, mainly. But, if I can put more duct on it
I'll just use it. Anybody???
Scott C. Wickham Jr.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
1972 Ser III
Zebra truck
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ <- Message 41 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <-
Browser -> ]From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 23:44:24 EST Subject: Re: Rear main seal - remove tranny or engine? In a message dated 99-03-10 02:25:47 EST, you write: << To help facilitate this procedure in the future I am planning on making the trany xmember removable on the new frame. Anyone else ever done this(made it not bought it that way)? Got any pics tips hints etc? Pete >> Yeah Pete, Look at a Range Rover. Bill Lawrence - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 42 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Ray Burton" <j_r_burton@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:52:29 PST Subject: re: Some of the most fun I've had with my clothes on: Charles Irvin wrote: >For me, it was obliterating several scrapped M113's with depleted >uranium rounds fired from Vulcan cannons at angels 10, and watching >the wood burning demo for the 2Kw floodlight! (didn't know you could >ignite a 2x12 board from 10 feet away!) The howitzer had its moments >too, but that's another story... I've either had the privelege of observing or actually firing quite a few heavy weapons back in the 70s, including observing a "Mad Minute", but one of the most impressive single events was when I watched a battery of M-42 "Duster"s at Camp Pickett firing for effect "en battery" at an old M-4 hulk down range. Watching 12 bofors 40mm firing in full-automatic spitting high explosive tracers at a single target is truely a sight to behold. Cheers, Ray Burton J_R_Burton@hotmail.com Richmond, Va. '64 s.2a 109 SW "Lola", '70 s.2a 88 hardtop, '84 RR "Brown Bess" ROAV; Central Va. Rover Owners; Mostly Metro; BRLRC #302; OVLR; R.O.V.E.R.S.; Solaros #139 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 43 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 23:49:57 EST Subject: Re: Rear main seal - remove tranny or engine? In a message dated 99-03-10 03:39:11 EST, you write: << I remember reading on an Australian web-page somewhere (sorry, lost the URL), that some guy reckoned you could remove the transmission without removing the seat box. There weren't any details, though. I can only presume that he spilt the various transmission components in situ. >> The SPO of my Series I cut the center out of the seat box. Now I need to get it welded back together. As I recall it may be possible to remove the trans without removing the seatbox, but it was a lot easier with it out of the way. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 44 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 23:58:22 EST Subject: Re: Rear main seal - remove tranny or engine? In a message dated 99-03-10 08:23:49 EST, you write: Well.... I am going to give you advise that is contrary to all the others. I have done main seals both ways and now I always remove the engine. This has nothing to do with the actual job of removing the engine or the gearbox but the fact that the seal replacement is sooo much easier when the engine is upside down on an engine stand. Those cork T pieces can cause much grief when you are working on your back with bits of mud and grease dropping in your eyes. You can also take the opportunity to check on how your crankshaft bearing are doing. John and Muddy PS some of the methods described to avoid removing the seat box seem like 10 times more work that removing the box. >> Generally the T pieces, which seal the sides of the block holding the rear main bearing, should not need to be replaced unless the bearing has been disturbed. I have to admit that the split seal and garter spring can be somewhat of a challenge lying on your back. Bill Lawrence - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 45 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:06:17 EST Subject: Re: Kirks Idling again In a message dated 99-03-10 08:27:32 EST, you write: Kirk it sounds very much like you a vacuum leak. There are a number of place where this is likely. 1. the carb to manifold connection, there are 2 gaskets and a plastic isolation block. Look care fully at the block as an undetected crack can cause problems. 2. The manifold to head gasket. 3. The intake manifold itself needs to checked for cracking. 4. It is possible that the brake servo is leaking either, externally where the white plastic elbow enters or where the master cylinder attaches, or internally through the diaphragm The sucking sound you hear would support the idea that the problem is with vacuum. The valve cover either on or off would not cause such a sound. John and Muddy >> One easy way to locate a vacuum leak is to use a propane torch (do not light it). While idling the engine open the valve and direct the propane to the suspected areas. If there is a leak thepropane will be pulled into the manifold and engine idle will pick up and maybe even stabilize. Other things that can cause a poor idle are tight or burned valves. Bill Lawrence - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 46 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:23:50 EST Subject: Re: more tranny evolutions In a message dated 99-03-10 13:12:34 EST, you write: Speaking of weird tranny removal, has anyone read that story about the Australian who removed, repaired and replaced his transmission singlehandedly at night in the midst of a raging flooded stream without spilling the oil? It must be right up there on the list of Really Cool Extemporaneous Engineering Exploits. I hope I never am called to perform such feats... Clinton >> I'd like to have the video of that. Might want to keep a finger on the mute button. What kind of warranty does he offer? Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 47 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:25:57 EST Subject: Re: free to a good home Seems like all the SI engines are in Canada. I'm building a 2 liter spreadbore and I've run into a brick wall because the PO disassembled the engine and let most of the fasteners get lost. I've had the gracious offer of a complete engine from another list member when I can afford to ship it, (Hang in there John.) but I wonder if you have any loose hardware laying around. some of the things I may have trouble finding are the brass cap nuts for the valve cover and tappet cover. A clutch and pressure plate (assuming an early SII set won't fit). Exhaust and intake manifold studs and nuts, front (timing) cover fasteners, oil pan studs and nuts, head bolts (full set), studs for rocker brackets, locating dowels for flywheel housing, flywheel bolts, CB brake master cylinder with three bolt flange. Lots more but I guess this is quite a list already. If you have any of this and you want to get rid of it let me know and we can arrange some way of getting it out of your way and into mine. Thanks. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 48 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:29:33 EST Subject: Re: Some of the most fun I've had with my clothes on: In a message dated 99-03-10 23:54:07 EST, you write: Charles Irvin wrote: >For me, it was obliterating several scrapped M113's with depleted >uranium rounds fired from Vulcan cannons at angels 10, and watching >the wood burning demo for the 2Kw floodlight! (didn't know you could >ignite a 2x12 board from 10 feet away!) The howitzer had its moments >too, but that's another story... I've either had the privelege of observing or actually firing quite a few heavy weapons back in the 70s, including observing a "Mad Minute", but one of the most impressive single events was when I watched a battery of M-42 "Duster"s at Camp Pickett firing for effect "en battery" at an old M-4 hulk down range. Watching 12 bofors 40mm firing in full-automatic spitting high explosive tracers at a single target is truely a sight to behold. Cheers, Ray Burton J_R_Burton@hotmail.com Richmond, Va. >> Oh you kids! Always bragging about your toys. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 49 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Peter Hope" <phope@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:42:11 -1000 Subject: Re: soft top > Does anybody have an OLD, HOLEY, DUCT-TAPED, soft top for an 88"? >Looking for one for a pattern, mainly. But, if I can put more duct on it >I'll just use it. Anybody??? Hi Scott, no soft top, at least not one I want to get rid of. But mine is off the vehicle(as are veryother part haha) and in a box in the garage. If you don't have any luck let me know and I could make up a pattern from butcher block paper for you. Wouldn't be that hard, and I need to do some sewing on it anyway. No holes or anything just some loose threads I want to take care of. BTW, speaking of soft tops I read somewhere (LROI or LRW) that people treat their softtops with Thompsons Water Seal to improve its water resistance. Anyone out their done this? Mahalo Pete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 50 -> | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 49 lines 2335 [forwarded 148 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1550 [content 1356 forwarded 105 (cut 43) whitespace 0] Land Rover Owner Subscription Information: * All new subscription requests are via the digest. * In addition so subscribing and unsubscribing, the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) file and the last month of daily digests may be retrieved (by mail) from majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net Useful commands for this are 'index lro-digest' which returns a list of files available, as well as 'get lro-digest <filename>', etc. World Wide Web Sites start at http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/pages.html (shadow) http://www2.Land-Rover.Team.Net/pages.html If majordomo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net -B[ First | Table of Contents | <- Digest 990311 -> | Search Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]